TSTP Solution File: CSR042+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR042+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.98s 3.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_579,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zeembhum/input.p',i_0_579) ).

cnf(i_0_2660,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zeembhum/input.p',i_0_2660) ).

cnf(i_0_2079,plain,
    ( borderson(X1,X2)
    | ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zeembhum/input.p',i_0_2079) ).

cnf(i_0_2659,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zeembhum/input.p',i_0_2659) ).

cnf(c_0_2665,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_579 ).

cnf(c_0_2666,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    i_0_2660 ).

cnf(c_0_2667,plain,
    ( borderson(X1,X2)
    | ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2079 ).

cnf(c_0_2668,plain,
    borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2666])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2669,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
    i_0_2659 ).

cnf(c_0_2670,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2667,c_0_2668]),c_0_2669]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR042+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 23:00:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.92/1.09  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.09  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.92/1.09  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.92/1.09  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.98/3.86  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 9.98/3.86  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.98/3.86  # Preprocessing time       : 0.049 s
% 9.98/3.86  
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof found!
% 9.98/3.86  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.98/3.86  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 9.98/3.86  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 9.98/3.86  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.98/3.86  # Parsed axioms                        : 2659
% 9.98/3.86  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Initial clauses                      : 2659
% 9.98/3.86  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2659
% 9.98/3.86  # Processed clauses                    : 109
% 9.98/3.86  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 9.98/3.86  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 9.98/3.86  # ...remaining for further processing  : 95
% 9.98/3.86  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 9.98/3.86  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 9.98/3.86  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Current number of processed clauses  : 95
% 9.98/3.86  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 60
% 9.98/3.86  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.98/3.86  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 9.98/3.86  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 31
% 9.98/3.86  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2550
% 9.98/3.86  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3900
% 9.98/3.86  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 257
% 9.98/3.86  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 215
% 9.98/3.86  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 9.98/3.86  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 9.98/3.86  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.98/3.86  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 36169
% 9.98/3.86  
% 9.98/3.86  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.98/3.86  # User time                : 0.045 s
% 9.98/3.86  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 9.98/3.86  # Total time               : 0.051 s
% 9.98/3.86  # ...preprocessing         : 0.049 s
% 9.98/3.86  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 9.98/3.86  # Maximum resident set size: 10316 pages
% 9.98/3.86  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------