TSTP Solution File: CSR041-10 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR041-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.94s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR041-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:36:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37 Sat Jun 11 05:36:37 2022
% 0.20/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28417.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.20/0.37 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,40] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,44] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,90] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,92] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,98] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,100] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,104] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,118] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,120] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,124] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [demod,122] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} true=true.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [copy,135,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37 135 back subsumes 38.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.42 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.42 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.42 number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.20/0.42 number of clauses initially in problem: 130
% 0.20/0.42 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 0
% 0.20/0.42 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 6
% 0.20/0.42 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.42 absolute distinct symbol count: 49
% 0.20/0.42 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.20/0.42 distinct function count: 26
% 0.20/0.42 distinct constant count: 22
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 8 [ 2 1 502 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 10 [ 1 1 1462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 11 [ 7 1 2206 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.55 sec ----> 142 [binary,140.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 1 [] {-} a!=b.
% 0.76/0.94 2 [copy,1,flip.1] {+} b!=a.
% 0.76/0.94 4,3 [] {+} ifeq3(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 0.76/0.94 6,5 [] {+} ifeq2(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 0.76/0.94 11 [] {-} ifeq3(aspatialinformationstore(A),true,aspatialthing(A),true)=true.
% 0.76/0.94 15 [] {-} ifeq3(microtheory(A),true,aspatialinformationstore(A),true)=true.
% 0.76/0.94 83 [] {+} microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(A,B))=true.
% 0.76/0.94 133 [] {-} ifeq2(aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),true,a,b)=b.
% 0.76/0.94 136 [para_into,15.1.1.1,83.1.1,demod,4] {+} aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(A,B))=true.
% 0.76/0.94 139,138 [para_from,136.1.1,11.1.1.1,demod,4] {-} aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(A,B))=true.
% 0.76/0.94 140 [back_demod,133,demod,139,6,flip.1] {-} b=a.
% 0.76/0.94 142 [binary,140.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 true clauses given 3 (11.1%)
% 0.76/0.94 false clauses given 24
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.94 8 2 0
% 0.76/0.94 10 23 0
% 0.76/0.94 11 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 12 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 15 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 17 10 0
% 0.76/0.94 19 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 tot: 39 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 11 [ 7 1 2206 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Process 28417 finished Sat Jun 11 05:36:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------