TSTP Solution File: CSR041+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR041+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 12.89s 14.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query191,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
   => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query191) ).

fof(ax3_3091,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
     => aspatialthing(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3091) ).

fof(ax3_5173,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( microtheory(X1)
     => aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5173) ).

fof(ax3_44207,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44207) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
     => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query191]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
    & ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X2)
      | aspatialthing(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3091])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aspatialthing(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ microtheory(X2)
      | aspatialinformationstore(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5173])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X4,X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3_44207]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR041+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 20:36:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 12.89/14.06  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.89/14.06  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.89/14.06  # Preprocessing time       : 0.660 s
% 12.89/14.06  
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof found!
% 12.89/14.06  # SZS status Theorem
% 12.89/14.06  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object total steps             : 15
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.89/14.06  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 12.89/14.06  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44116
% 12.89/14.06  # Initial clauses                      : 102
% 12.89/14.06  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 12.89/14.06  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 101
% 12.89/14.06  # Processed clauses                    : 103
% 12.89/14.06  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 12.89/14.06  # ...subsumed                          : 17
% 12.89/14.06  # ...remaining for further processing  : 75
% 12.89/14.06  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 12.89/14.06  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 12.89/14.06  # Generated clauses                    : 111
% 12.89/14.06  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 80
% 12.89/14.06  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Paramodulations                      : 109
% 12.89/14.06  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 12.89/14.06  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 12.89/14.06  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.89/14.06  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 12.89/14.06  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 35
% 12.89/14.06  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 12.89/14.06  # ...number of literals in the above   : 119
% 12.89/14.06  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 12.89/14.06  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 284
% 12.89/14.06  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 267
% 12.89/14.06  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 12.89/14.06  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 12.89/14.06  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 12.89/14.06  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.89/14.06  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 295867
% 12.89/14.06  
% 12.89/14.06  # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.89/14.06  # User time                : 0.614 s
% 12.89/14.06  # System time              : 0.048 s
% 12.89/14.06  # Total time               : 0.662 s
% 12.89/14.06  # Maximum resident set size: 86708 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------