TSTP Solution File: CSR041+4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR041+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:31:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 27.31s 26.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 27.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query191,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
   => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dt7KpK56h7/E---3.1_30053.p',query191) ).

fof(ax3_3091,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
     => aspatialthing(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dt7KpK56h7/E---3.1_30053.p',ax3_3091) ).

fof(ax3_5173,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( microtheory(X1)
     => aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dt7KpK56h7/E---3.1_30053.p',ax3_5173) ).

fof(ax3_44207,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dt7KpK56h7/E---3.1_30053.p',ax3_44207) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
     => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query191]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
    & ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X24] :
      ( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X24)
      | aspatialthing(X24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3091])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aspatialthing(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X31] :
      ( ~ microtheory(X31)
      | aspatialinformationstore(X31) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5173])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X48,X49)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3_44207]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 13.00/13.03  % Problem    : CSR041+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 13.00/13.04  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 13.04/13.25  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 13.04/13.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 13.04/13.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 13.04/13.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 13.04/13.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 13.04/13.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 13.04/13.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 13.04/13.25  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:23:50 EDT 2024
% 13.04/13.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 26.05/26.24  Running first-order theorem proving
% 26.05/26.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dt7KpK56h7/E---3.1_30053.p
% 27.31/26.83  # Version: 3.1.0
% 27.31/26.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 27.31/26.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # new_bool_1 with pid 30134 completed with status 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 27.31/26.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 27.31/26.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 27.31/26.83  # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 27.31/26.83  # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 27.31/26.83  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 30137 completed with status 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 27.31/26.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 27.31/26.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 27.31/26.83  # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 27.31/26.83  # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 27.31/26.83  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 27.31/26.83  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 27.31/26.83  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 27.31/26.83  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 27.31/26.83  
% 27.31/26.83  # Proof found!
% 27.31/26.83  # SZS status Theorem
% 27.31/26.83  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 27.31/26.83  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 27.31/26.83  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44135
% 27.31/26.83  # Initial clauses                      : 83
% 27.31/26.83  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 27.31/26.83  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 27.31/26.83  # Processed clauses                    : 141
% 27.31/26.83  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 27.31/26.83  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 27.31/26.83  # ...remaining for further processing  : 120
% 27.31/26.83  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 27.31/26.83  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 27.31/26.83  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 27.31/26.83  # Generated clauses                    : 85
% 27.31/26.83  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 27.31/26.83  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Paramodulations                      : 83
% 27.31/26.83  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # NegExts                              : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 27.31/26.83  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Total rewrite steps                  : 36
% 27.31/26.83  # ...of those cached                   : 17
% 27.31/26.83  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 27.31/26.83  # Current number of processed clauses  : 57
% 27.31/26.83  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 27.31/26.83  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 27.31/26.83  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 27.31/26.83  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 29
% 27.31/26.83  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
% 27.31/26.83  # ...number of literals in the above   : 85
% 27.31/26.83  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Current number of archived clauses   : 61
% 27.31/26.83  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 409
% 27.31/26.83  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 393
% 27.31/26.83  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 27.31/26.83  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 27.31/26.83  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 27.31/26.83  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 27.31/26.83  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 27.31/26.83  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 295591
% 27.31/26.83  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 157860
% 27.31/26.83  
% 27.31/26.83  # -------------------------------------------------
% 27.31/26.83  # User time                : 0.160 s
% 27.31/26.83  # System time              : 0.076 s
% 27.31/26.83  # Total time               : 0.236 s
% 27.31/26.83  # Maximum resident set size: 81764 pages
% 27.31/26.83  
% 27.31/26.83  # -------------------------------------------------
% 27.31/26.83  # User time                : 0.464 s
% 27.31/26.83  # System time              : 0.106 s
% 27.31/26.83  # Total time               : 0.570 s
% 27.31/26.83  # Maximum resident set size: 34600 pages
% 27.31/26.83  % E---3.1 exiting
% 27.31/26.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------