TSTP Solution File: CSR041+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR041+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:29 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.49s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query141,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
   => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query141) ).

fof(ax2_1406,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
     => aspatialthing(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1406) ).

fof(ax2_3192,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( microtheory(X1)
     => aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3192) ).

fof(ax2_7969,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X3,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7969) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
     => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query141]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
    & ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X23] :
      ( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X23)
      | aspatialthing(X23) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1406])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aspatialthing(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X31] :
      ( ~ microtheory(X31)
      | aspatialinformationstore(X31) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3192])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X45,X46] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X45,X46)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax2_7969]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : CSR041+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 01:35:52 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/0.58  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.49/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # new_bool_1 with pid 15228 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.49/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.58  # Search class: FHHNS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.58  # partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.58  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15231 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.49/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.58  # Search class: FHHNS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.58  # partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.58  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.49/0.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.49/0.58  
% 0.49/0.58  # Proof found!
% 0.49/0.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.49/0.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.49/0.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7935
% 0.49/0.58  # Initial clauses                      : 72
% 0.49/0.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 0.49/0.58  # Processed clauses                    : 86
% 0.49/0.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.49/0.58  # ...subsumed                          : 12
% 0.49/0.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 65
% 0.49/0.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.49/0.58  # Generated clauses                    : 3
% 0.49/0.58  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.49/0.58  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Paramodulations                      : 3
% 0.49/0.58  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.49/0.58  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.49/0.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.49/0.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.49/0.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.49/0.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.49/0.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.49/0.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.49/0.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38
% 0.49/0.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 66
% 0.49/0.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 0.49/0.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 183
% 0.49/0.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.49/0.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12
% 0.49/0.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.49/0.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.49/0.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.49/0.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.49/0.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 53545
% 0.49/0.58  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 31202
% 0.49/0.58  
% 0.49/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.58  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.49/0.58  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.49/0.58  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.49/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 18136 pages
% 0.49/0.58  
% 0.49/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.58  # User time                : 0.103 s
% 0.49/0.58  # System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.49/0.58  # Total time               : 0.129 s
% 0.49/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 7960 pages
% 0.49/0.58  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------