TSTP Solution File: CSR038+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR038+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.95s 14.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query188,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X16,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query188) ).
fof(ax3_36134,axiom,
! [X16] :
( isa(X16,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_36134) ).
fof(ax3_14429,axiom,
! [X5] :
( isa(X5,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X5,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_14429) ).
fof(ax3_4485,axiom,
! [X5,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( isa(X5,X9)
& relationexistsall(X10,X11,X9) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X5,X10,X11,X9),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4485) ).
fof(ax3_4303,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4303) ).
fof(ax3_14430,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_14430) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X16,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X16) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query188]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X17] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X17,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X17) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X17] :
( ~ isa(X17,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X17) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_36134])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ isa(X6,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_14429])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14,X15] :
( ~ isa(X12,X13)
| ~ relationexistsall(X14,X15,X13)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X12,X14,X15,X13),X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4485])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4303]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_14430]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : CSR038+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:17:39 EDT 2022
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 12.95/14.14 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.95/14.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.95/14.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.642 s
% 12.95/14.14
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof found!
% 12.95/14.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.95/14.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 12.95/14.14 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 12.95/14.14 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.95/14.14 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 12.95/14.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44118
% 12.95/14.14 # Initial clauses : 100
% 12.95/14.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 12.95/14.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 99
% 12.95/14.14 # Processed clauses : 145
% 12.95/14.14 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 12.95/14.14 # ...subsumed : 19
% 12.95/14.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 114
% 12.95/14.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 12.95/14.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 12.95/14.14 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 12.95/14.14 # Generated clauses : 80
% 12.95/14.14 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 57
% 12.95/14.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 12.95/14.14 # Paramodulations : 78
% 12.95/14.14 # Factorizations : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 12.95/14.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 107
% 12.95/14.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 54
% 12.95/14.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 12.95/14.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 48
% 12.95/14.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 12.95/14.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 12.95/14.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 12.95/14.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 458
% 12.95/14.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 414
% 12.95/14.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24
% 12.95/14.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84
% 12.95/14.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 12.95/14.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 12.95/14.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 12.95/14.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 296414
% 12.95/14.14
% 12.95/14.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.95/14.14 # User time : 0.595 s
% 12.95/14.14 # System time : 0.051 s
% 12.95/14.14 # Total time : 0.646 s
% 12.95/14.14 # Maximum resident set size: 87792 pages
% 12.95/14.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.25 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.25 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/14.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/14.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.13 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 12.95/36.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 12.95/36.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/36.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.95/36.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 12.95/36.22 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------