TSTP Solution File: CSR038+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR038+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.83s 2.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query138,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X15,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query138) ).
fof(ax2_7785,axiom,
! [X15] :
( isa(X15,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7785) ).
fof(ax2_85,axiom,
! [X7] :
( isa(X7,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_85) ).
fof(ax2_453,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( isa(X7,X8)
& relationexistsall(X9,X10,X8) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,X9,X10,X8),X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_453) ).
fof(ax2_1129,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1129) ).
fof(ax2_86,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_86) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X15,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query138]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X16,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X16) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X16] :
( ~ isa(X16,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X16) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7785])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X8] :
( ~ isa(X8,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X8,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_85])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14] :
( ~ isa(X11,X12)
| ~ relationexistsall(X13,X14,X12)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X11,X13,X14,X12),X14) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_453])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1129]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR038+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 11:49:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.83/2.00 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.83/2.00 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.83/2.00 # Preprocessing time : 0.082 s
% 0.83/2.00
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof found!
% 0.83/2.00 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.83/2.00 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.83/2.00 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.83/2.00 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.83/2.00 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.83/2.00 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7932
% 0.83/2.00 # Initial clauses : 75
% 0.83/2.00 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 0.83/2.00 # Processed clauses : 86
% 0.83/2.00 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.83/2.00 # ...subsumed : 17
% 0.83/2.00 # ...remaining for further processing : 64
% 0.83/2.00 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Generated clauses : 26
% 0.83/2.00 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 11
% 0.83/2.00 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Paramodulations : 26
% 0.83/2.00 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 0.83/2.00 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.83/2.00 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.83/2.00 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 0.83/2.00 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.83/2.00 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 234
% 0.83/2.00 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197
% 0.83/2.00 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.83/2.00 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.83/2.00 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.83/2.00 # Termbank termtop insertions : 54484
% 0.83/2.00
% 0.83/2.00 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.83/2.00 # User time : 0.075 s
% 0.83/2.00 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.83/2.00 # Total time : 0.084 s
% 0.83/2.00 # Maximum resident set size: 20268 pages
% 0.83/24.01 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.83/24.03 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.03 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.03 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.03 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.04 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.04 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.04 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.04 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.05 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.05 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.05 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.05 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.06 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.06 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.08 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.83/24.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/24.08 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------