TSTP Solution File: CSR038+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR038+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.00s 2.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_73,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_73) ).
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s3pny_rd/input.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
i_0_73 ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_83]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),c_0_89]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR038+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:29:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.00/2.41 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.00/2.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.00/2.41 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.00/2.41 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0e
% 8.00/2.41 # and selection function SelectLargestNegLit.
% 8.00/2.41 #
% 8.00/2.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 8.00/2.41
% 8.00/2.41 # Proof found!
% 8.00/2.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.00/2.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.00/2.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.00/2.41
% 8.00/2.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.00/2.41 # User time : 0.016 s
% 8.00/2.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 8.00/2.41 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 8.00/2.41 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.00/2.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------