TSTP Solution File: CSR037+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 80.68s 73.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 80.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_424,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ct3plfu/input.p',i_0_424) ).
cnf(i_0_3476,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ct3plfu/input.p',i_0_3476) ).
cnf(i_0_2582,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ct3plfu/input.p',i_0_2582) ).
cnf(i_0_3208,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ct3plfu/input.p',i_0_3208) ).
cnf(i_0_3475,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ct3plfu/input.p',i_0_3475) ).
cnf(c_0_3482,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_424 ).
cnf(c_0_3483,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
i_0_3476 ).
cnf(c_0_3484,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
i_0_2582 ).
cnf(c_0_3485,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3482,c_0_3483])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3486,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_3208 ).
cnf(c_0_3487,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
i_0_3475 ).
cnf(c_0_3488,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3484,c_0_3485]) ).
cnf(c_0_3489,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3486,c_0_3483])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3490,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3487,c_0_3488]),c_0_3489])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 02:43:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 69.73/69.88 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 69.73/69.88 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 69.73/69.88 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 69.73/69.88 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 80.68/73.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 80.68/73.34 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 80.68/73.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.103 s
% 80.68/73.34
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof found!
% 80.68/73.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 80.68/73.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 80.68/73.34 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 80.68/73.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 80.68/73.34 # Parsed axioms : 3476
% 80.68/73.34 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Initial clauses : 3476
% 80.68/73.34 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3476
% 80.68/73.34 # Processed clauses : 3481
% 80.68/73.34 # ...of these trivial : 149
% 80.68/73.34 # ...subsumed : 19
% 80.68/73.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 3313
% 80.68/73.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Backward-rewritten : 22
% 80.68/73.34 # Generated clauses : 5745
% 80.68/73.34 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5601
% 80.68/73.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 80.68/73.34 # Paramodulations : 5745
% 80.68/73.34 # Factorizations : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 3291
% 80.68/73.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1955
% 80.68/73.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 80.68/73.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 1332
% 80.68/73.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5530
% 80.68/73.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 8867
% 80.68/73.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 22
% 80.68/73.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 179602
% 80.68/73.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 160949
% 80.68/73.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 23
% 80.68/73.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59212
% 80.68/73.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 168
% 80.68/73.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 80.68/73.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 80.68/73.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 84979
% 80.68/73.34
% 80.68/73.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 80.68/73.34 # User time : 0.233 s
% 80.68/73.34 # System time : 0.022 s
% 80.68/73.34 # Total time : 0.255 s
% 80.68/73.34 # ...preprocessing : 0.103 s
% 80.68/73.34 # ...main loop : 0.152 s
% 80.68/73.34 # Maximum resident set size: 27692 pages
% 80.68/73.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------