TSTP Solution File: CSR037+6 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:25 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 217.17s 81.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 217.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  12   ~;   9   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query287,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query287) ).

fof(ax5_1312400,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1312400) ).

fof(ax5_3337975,axiom,
    ! [X16,X18,X14] :
      ( ( geographicalsubregions(X16,X18)
        & geographicalsubregions(X18,X14) )
     => geographicalsubregions(X16,X14) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3337975) ).

fof(ax5_768291,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_768291) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query287]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1312400])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    & ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X44,X45,X46] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X44,X45)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X45,X46)
      | geographicalsubregions(X44,X46) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3337975])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_768291])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 01:32:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 217.17/81.15  # Version: 3.1.0
% 217.17/81.15  # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 217.17/81.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 252 seconds (2016 total)
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting sh3 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # new_ho_10 with pid 7229 completed with status 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 217.17/81.15  # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 217.17/81.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 252 seconds (2016 total)
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 217.17/81.15  # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 217.17/81.15  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 485 seconds (485 total)
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 262s (1) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10 with 49s (1) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # new_ho_10 with pid 7783 completed with status 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 217.17/81.15  # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 217.17/81.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 252 seconds (2016 total)
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10 with 504s (2) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 217.17/81.15  # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 217.17/81.15  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 485 seconds (485 total)
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 262s (1) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Starting new_ho_10 with 49s (1) cores
% 217.17/81.15  # Preprocessing time       : 1.669 s
% 217.17/81.15  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 217.17/81.15  
% 217.17/81.15  # Proof found!
% 217.17/81.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 217.17/81.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 217.17/81.15  # Parsed axioms                        : 3341978
% 217.17/81.15  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3326598
% 217.17/81.15  # Initial clauses                      : 15381
% 217.17/81.15  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 217.17/81.15  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15379
% 217.17/81.15  # Processed clauses                    : 27850
% 217.17/81.15  # ...of these trivial                  : 2211
% 217.17/81.15  # ...subsumed                          : 237
% 217.17/81.15  # ...remaining for further processing  : 25402
% 217.17/81.15  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 217.17/81.15  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 217.17/81.15  # Backward-rewritten                   : 842
% 217.17/81.15  # Generated clauses                    : 9187
% 217.17/81.15  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5963
% 217.17/81.15  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Paramodulations                      : 9186
% 217.17/81.15  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # NegExts                              : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 217.17/81.15  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8534
% 217.17/81.15  # ...of those cached                   : 5914
% 217.17/81.15  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 217.17/81.15  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11109
% 217.17/81.15  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7343
% 217.17/81.15  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 217.17/81.15  #    Negative unit clauses             : 991
% 217.17/81.15  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2775
% 217.17/81.15  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6895
% 217.17/81.15  # ...number of literals in the above   : 10067
% 217.17/81.15  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14292
% 217.17/81.15  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1332759
% 217.17/81.15  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1186341
% 217.17/81.15  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 213
% 217.17/81.15  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1307800
% 217.17/81.15  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 23853
% 217.17/81.15  # BW rewrite match successes           : 346
% 217.17/81.15  # Condensation attempts                : 27929
% 217.17/81.15  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 217.17/81.15  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 22534124
% 217.17/81.15  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 10471851
% 217.17/81.15  
% 217.17/81.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 217.17/81.15  # User time                : 23.367 s
% 217.17/81.15  # System time              : 7.032 s
% 217.17/81.15  # Total time               : 30.399 s
% 217.17/81.15  # Maximum resident set size: 4955724 pages
% 217.17/81.15  
% 217.17/81.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 217.17/81.15  # User time                : 77.936 s
% 217.17/81.15  # System time              : 12.248 s
% 217.17/81.15  # Total time               : 90.184 s
% 217.17/81.15  # Maximum resident set size: 2207456 pages
% 217.17/81.15  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------