TSTP Solution File: CSR037+6 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:13:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 207.55s 84.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 207.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query287,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query287) ).
fof(ax5_1312400,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1312400) ).
fof(ax5_3337975,axiom,
! [X16,X18,X14] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X16,X18)
& geographicalsubregions(X18,X14) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X16,X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3337975) ).
fof(ax5_768291,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_768291) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query287]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1312400])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X44,X45,X46] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X44,X45)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X45,X46)
| geographicalsubregions(X44,X46) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3337975])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_768291])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:32:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 207.55/84.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 207.55/84.52 # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 207.55/84.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 247 seconds (1976 total)
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting sh3 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # new_ho_10 with pid 22422 completed with status 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 207.55/84.52 # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 207.55/84.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 247 seconds (1976 total)
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 207.55/84.52 # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 207.55/84.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 476 seconds (476 total)
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 258s (1) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 48s (1) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # new_ho_10 with pid 22428 completed with status 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 207.55/84.52 # Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 207.55/84.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 247 seconds (1976 total)
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 494s (2) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 207.55/84.52 # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 207.55/84.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 476 seconds (476 total)
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 258s (1) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 48s (1) cores
% 207.55/84.52 # Preprocessing time : 1.272 s
% 207.55/84.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 207.55/84.52
% 207.55/84.52 # Proof found!
% 207.55/84.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 207.55/84.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 207.55/84.52 # Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 207.55/84.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3326598
% 207.55/84.52 # Initial clauses : 15381
% 207.55/84.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 207.55/84.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15379
% 207.55/84.52 # Processed clauses : 27850
% 207.55/84.52 # ...of these trivial : 2210
% 207.55/84.52 # ...subsumed : 237
% 207.55/84.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 25403
% 207.55/84.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 207.55/84.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 207.55/84.52 # Backward-rewritten : 842
% 207.55/84.52 # Generated clauses : 9188
% 207.55/84.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5963
% 207.55/84.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Paramodulations : 9187
% 207.55/84.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # NegExts : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 207.55/84.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Total rewrite steps : 8534
% 207.55/84.52 # ...of those cached : 5914
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 207.55/84.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 11110
% 207.55/84.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7344
% 207.55/84.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Negative unit clauses : 991
% 207.55/84.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 2775
% 207.55/84.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6895
% 207.55/84.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 10067
% 207.55/84.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 14292
% 207.55/84.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1332871
% 207.55/84.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1186396
% 207.55/84.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 213
% 207.55/84.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1307999
% 207.55/84.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 23853
% 207.55/84.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 346
% 207.55/84.52 # Condensation attempts : 27929
% 207.55/84.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 207.55/84.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 22534131
% 207.55/84.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 10471851
% 207.55/84.52
% 207.55/84.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 207.55/84.52 # User time : 20.587 s
% 207.55/84.52 # System time : 6.437 s
% 207.55/84.52 # Total time : 27.024 s
% 207.55/84.52 # Maximum resident set size: 4954724 pages
% 207.55/84.52
% 207.55/84.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 207.55/84.52 # User time : 78.176 s
% 207.55/84.52 # System time : 12.010 s
% 207.55/84.52 # Total time : 90.187 s
% 207.55/84.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2206456 pages
% 207.55/84.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 207.55/84.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------