TSTP Solution File: CSR037+2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:11:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 9.66s 2.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 22 ~; 18 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f188,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_188) ).
fof(f276,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_276) ).
fof(f1041,axiom,
! [X12,X13,X18] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X13,X18)
& geographicalsubregions(X12,X13) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X12,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_1041) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query87) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1707,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
& geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1041]) ).
fof(f1980,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).
fof(f2017,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f276]) ).
fof(f2589,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1707]) ).
fof(f2590,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f2589]) ).
fof(f2684,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f2871,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1980]) ).
fof(f2959,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2017]) ).
fof(f3643,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2590]) ).
fof(f3724,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2684]) ).
fof(f3725,plain,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2684]) ).
cnf(c_235,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2871]) ).
cnf(c_323,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2959]) ).
cnf(c_1007,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3643]) ).
cnf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3725]) ).
cnf(c_1089,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3724]) ).
cnf(c_32489,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,X0)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,X0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1007]) ).
cnf(c_33835,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_32489]) ).
cnf(c_33836,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_33835,c_235,c_323,c_1088,c_1089]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:27:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 9.66/2.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 9.66/2.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ iProver source info
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 9.66/2.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 9.66/2.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Parsing...
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 30 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe:64:0s pe:128:0s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Proving...
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 clauses 770
% 9.66/2.16 conjectures 2
% 9.66/2.16 EPR 722
% 9.66/2.16 Horn 770
% 9.66/2.16 unary 279
% 9.66/2.16 binary 455
% 9.66/2.16 lits 1297
% 9.66/2.16 lits eq 0
% 9.66/2.16 fd_pure 0
% 9.66/2.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 9.66/2.16 fd_cond 0
% 9.66/2.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 9.66/2.16 AC symbols 0
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------
% 9.66/2.16 Current options:
% 9.66/2.16 ------
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 ------ Proving...
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.66/2.16
% 9.66/2.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------