TSTP Solution File: CSR037+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 23:07:06 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 118.09s
% Output : Solution 118.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18601/CSR037+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18601/CSR037+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18601/CSR037+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 18877
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.082 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)&geographicalsubregions(X2,X3))=>geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_1041)).
% fof(2, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_188)).
% fof(3, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_276)).
% fof(1132, conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', query87)).
% fof(1133, negated_conjecture,~((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1132])).
% fof(1137, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(geographicalsubregions(X1,X2))|~(geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)))|geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(1138, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(geographicalsubregions(X4,X5))|~(geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)))|geographicalsubregions(X4,X6)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1137])).
% cnf(1139,plain,(geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)|~geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)|~geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1138])).
% fof(1140, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt))|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% cnf(1141,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1140])).
% fof(1142, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt))|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% cnf(1143,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1142])).
% fof(3864, negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&~(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1133])).
% cnf(3865,negated_conjecture,(~geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3864])).
% cnf(3866,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3864])).
% cnf(3867,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1141,3866,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3868,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[3867,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3871,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1143,3866,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3872,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[3871,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4100,plain,(geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|~geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1139,3868,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7263,negated_conjecture,(~geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[3865,4100,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7269,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[7263,3872,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7270,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[7269,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7271,negated_conjecture,($false),7270,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 1506
% # ...of these trivial : 105
% # ...subsumed : 31
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1370
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 9
% # Generated clauses : 3070
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2572
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 3070
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1361
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 568
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 4
% # Non-unit-clauses : 789
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2193
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3843
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 331323
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 311803
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31446
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 4
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index: 1585 leaves, 1.06+/-0.398 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 844 leaves, 1.00+/-0.077 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 1344 leaves, 1.06+/-0.320 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.258 s
% # System time : 0.014 s
% # Total time : 0.272 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.45 CPU 0.53 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.45 CPU 0.53 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18601/CSR037+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------