TSTP Solution File: CSR037+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.73s 2.87s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_217,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tikzbo70/input.p',i_0_217) ).
cnf(i_0_1066,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tikzbo70/input.p',i_0_1066) ).
cnf(i_0_46,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tikzbo70/input.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(i_0_313,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tikzbo70/input.p',i_0_313) ).
cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tikzbo70/input.p',i_0_1065) ).
cnf(c_0_1072,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_217 ).
cnf(c_0_1073,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
i_0_1066 ).
cnf(c_0_1074,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_1075,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1072,c_0_1073])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1076,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_313 ).
cnf(c_0_1077,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
i_0_1065 ).
cnf(c_0_1078,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1074,c_0_1075]) ).
cnf(c_0_1079,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1073])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1080,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077,c_0_1078]),c_0_1079])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:41:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.73/2.87 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 5.73/2.87 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.73/2.87 # Preprocessing time : 0.036 s
% 5.73/2.87
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof found!
% 5.73/2.87 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.73/2.87 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 5.73/2.87 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 5.73/2.87 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.73/2.87 # Parsed axioms : 1066
% 5.73/2.87 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Initial clauses : 1066
% 5.73/2.87 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1066
% 5.73/2.87 # Processed clauses : 1092
% 5.73/2.87 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 5.73/2.87 # ...subsumed : 31
% 5.73/2.87 # ...remaining for further processing : 1060
% 5.73/2.87 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 5.73/2.87 # Generated clauses : 2325
% 5.73/2.87 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2120
% 5.73/2.87 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Paramodulations : 2325
% 5.73/2.87 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Current number of processed clauses : 1053
% 5.73/2.87 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 343
% 5.73/2.87 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 5.73/2.87 # Non-unit-clauses : 697
% 5.73/2.87 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2085
% 5.73/2.87 # ...number of literals in the above : 3651
% 5.73/2.87 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 5.73/2.87 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 72850
% 5.73/2.87 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67347
% 5.73/2.87 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 31
% 5.73/2.87 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5440
% 5.73/2.87 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 5.73/2.87 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 5.73/2.87 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.73/2.87 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32443
% 5.73/2.87
% 5.73/2.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.73/2.87 # User time : 0.071 s
% 5.73/2.87 # System time : 0.012 s
% 5.73/2.87 # Total time : 0.083 s
% 5.73/2.87 # ...preprocessing : 0.036 s
% 5.73/2.87 # ...main loop : 0.047 s
% 5.73/2.87 # Maximum resident set size: 10228 pages
% 5.73/2.87
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------