TSTP Solution File: CSR037+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query87,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query87) ).
fof(ax1_188,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_188) ).
fof(ax1_1041,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X13,X14)
& geographicalsubregions(X14,X19) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1041) ).
fof(ax1_276,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_276) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query87]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_188]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X20,X21)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X21,X22)
| geographicalsubregions(X20,X22) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1041])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_276]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:29:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.26/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1126
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.26/1.45 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7597
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45 # User time : 0.028 s
% 0.26/1.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------