TSTP Solution File: CSR037+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query87,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query87) ).
fof(ax1_188,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_188) ).
fof(ax1_1041,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X13,X14)
& geographicalsubregions(X14,X19) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1041) ).
fof(ax1_276,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_276) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query87]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_188])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X22,X23)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X23,X24)
| geographicalsubregions(X22,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1041])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_276])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # new_bool_3 with pid 26797 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26802 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1126
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.20/0.51 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.20/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.20/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.20/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7661
% 0.20/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4864
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 4040 pages
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2656 pages
% 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------