TSTP Solution File: CSR037+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:11:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.08s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just13) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X10,X11)
& geographicalsubregions(X9,X10) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X9,X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just34) ).
fof(f66,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query37) ).
fof(f67,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
& geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f123,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f149,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f150,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f149]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f196,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).
fof(f216,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f246,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).
cnf(c_61,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f197]) ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f216]) ).
cnf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f247]) ).
cnf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f246]) ).
cnf(c_132,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_111,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_134,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_111,c_60]) ).
cnf(c_311,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,X0)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_134]) ).
cnf(c_318,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_132]) ).
cnf(c_319,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_318,c_110]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:31:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.08/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.08/1.17 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.08/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Parsing...
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 45 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Preprocessing...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.08/1.17 gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 clauses 7
% 2.08/1.17 conjectures 1
% 2.08/1.17 EPR 7
% 2.08/1.17 Horn 7
% 2.08/1.17 unary 3
% 2.08/1.17 binary 3
% 2.08/1.17 lits 12
% 2.08/1.17 lits eq 0
% 2.08/1.17 fd_pure 0
% 2.08/1.17 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.08/1.17 fd_cond 0
% 2.08/1.17 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.08/1.17 AC symbols 0
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------
% 2.08/1.17 Current options:
% 2.08/1.17 ------
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.08/1.17
% 2.08/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------