TSTP Solution File: CSR035+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR035+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 15.44s 17.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 15.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query185,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query185) ).
fof(ax3_4888,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4888) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X16) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query185]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
| prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4888]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X17] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
& ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X17) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
| ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_englishmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.08 % Problem : CSR035+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.05/0.09 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 12:35:50 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 15.44/17.63 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 15.44/17.63 # Preprocessing time : 1.548 s
% 15.44/17.63
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof found!
% 15.44/17.63 # SZS status Theorem
% 15.44/17.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 15.44/17.63 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 15.44/17.63 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 15.44/17.63 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Initial clauses : 44218
% 15.44/17.63 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 15.44/17.63 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44215
% 15.44/17.63 # Processed clauses : 12
% 15.44/17.63 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # ...subsumed : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 15.44/17.63 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Generated clauses : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Paramodulations : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Factorizations : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 15.44/17.63 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 15.44/17.63 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 15.44/17.63 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44203
% 15.44/17.63 # ...number of literals in the above : 65435
% 15.44/17.63 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 15.44/17.63 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Condensation successes : 0
% 15.44/17.63 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1539219
% 15.44/17.63
% 15.44/17.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.44/17.63 # User time : 1.509 s
% 15.44/17.63 # System time : 0.067 s
% 15.44/17.63 # Total time : 1.576 s
% 15.44/17.63 # Maximum resident set size: 124664 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------