TSTP Solution File: CSR035+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:41:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 10:45:58 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.39 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.39 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.16/0.39 fof(just1, axiom, mtvisible(c_englishmt) => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam, c_affiliatedwith, c_beloitcollege), s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)).
% 0.16/0.39 fof(just2, axiom, ![OBJ, COL1, COL2]: ~(isa(OBJ, COL1) & (isa(OBJ, COL2) & disjointwith(COL1, COL2)))).
% 0.16/0.39 fof(just29, axiom, ![X]: ~affiliatedwith(X, X)).
% 0.16/0.39 fof(query35, conjecture, ?[X2]: (mtvisible(c_englishmt) => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam, c_affiliatedwith, c_beloitcollege), X2))).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.16/0.39 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.16/0.39 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.16/0.39 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.16/0.39 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.16/0.39 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.16/0.39 variables of u and v.
% 0.16/0.39 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.16/0.39 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 Axiom 1 (query35): mtvisible(c_englishmt) = true2.
% 0.16/0.39 Axiom 2 (just1): fresh36(X, X) = true2.
% 0.16/0.39 Axiom 3 (just1): fresh36(mtvisible(c_englishmt), true2) = prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam, c_affiliatedwith, c_beloitcollege), s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 Goal 1 (query35_1): prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam, c_affiliatedwith, c_beloitcollege), X) = true2.
% 0.16/0.39 The goal is true when:
% 0.16/0.39 X = s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 Proof:
% 0.16/0.39 prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam, c_affiliatedwith, c_beloitcollege), s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
% 0.16/0.39 = { by axiom 3 (just1) R->L }
% 0.16/0.39 fresh36(mtvisible(c_englishmt), true2)
% 0.16/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (query35) }
% 0.16/0.39 fresh36(true2, true2)
% 0.16/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (just1) }
% 0.16/0.39 true2
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------