TSTP Solution File: CSR035+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:04:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.44s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 02:11:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98 Process 1296 was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98 Sat Jun 11 02:11:25 2022
% 0.44/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_1052_n005.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_1052_n005.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (39 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98 1 mtvisible(c_englishmt) -> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) # label(just1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 2 (all OBJ all COL1 all COL2 -(isa(OBJ,COL1) & isa(OBJ,COL2) & disjointwith(COL1,COL2))) # label(just2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 3 (all SPECPRED all PRED all GENLPRED (genlinverse(SPECPRED,PRED) & genlinverse(PRED,GENLPRED) -> genlpreds(SPECPRED,GENLPRED))) # label(just3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 4 (all ARG1 all INS (genlpreds(ARG1,INS) -> predicate(INS))) # label(just4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 5 (all ARG1 all INS (genlpreds(ARG1,INS) -> predicate(INS))) # label(just5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 6 (all INS all ARG2 (genlpreds(INS,ARG2) -> predicate(INS))) # label(just6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 7 (all INS all ARG2 (genlpreds(INS,ARG2) -> predicate(INS))) # label(just7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 8 (all X all Y all Z (genlpreds(X,Y) & genlpreds(Y,Z) -> genlpreds(X,Z))) # label(just8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 9 (all X (predicate(X) -> genlpreds(X,X))) # label(just9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 10 (all X (predicate(X) -> genlpreds(X,X))) # label(just10) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 11 (all ARG1 all INS (genlinverse(ARG1,INS) -> binarypredicate(INS))) # label(just11) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 12 (all INS all ARG2 (genlinverse(INS,ARG2) -> binarypredicate(INS))) # label(just12) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 13 (all OLD all ARG2 all NEW (genlinverse(OLD,ARG2) & genlpreds(NEW,OLD) -> genlinverse(NEW,ARG2))) # label(just13) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 14 (all ARG1 all OLD all NEW (genlinverse(ARG1,OLD) & genlpreds(OLD,NEW) -> genlinverse(ARG1,NEW))) # label(just14) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 15 (all ARG1 all INS (disjointwith(ARG1,INS) -> collection(INS))) # label(just15) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 16 (all INS all ARG2 (disjointwith(INS,ARG2) -> collection(INS))) # label(just16) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 17 (all X all Y (disjointwith(X,Y) -> disjointwith(Y,X))) # label(just17) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 18 (all ARG1 all OLD all NEW (disjointwith(ARG1,OLD) & genls(NEW,OLD) -> disjointwith(ARG1,NEW))) # label(just18) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 19 (all OLD all ARG2 all NEW (disjointwith(OLD,ARG2) & genls(NEW,OLD) -> disjointwith(NEW,ARG2))) # label(just19) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 20 (all ARG1 all INS (isa(ARG1,INS) -> collection(INS))) # label(just20) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 21 (all ARG1 all INS (isa(ARG1,INS) -> collection(INS))) # label(just21) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 22 (all INS all ARG2 (isa(INS,ARG2) -> thing(INS))) # label(just22) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 23 (all INS all ARG2 (isa(INS,ARG2) -> thing(INS))) # label(just23) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 24 (all ARG1 all OLD all NEW (isa(ARG1,OLD) & genls(OLD,NEW) -> isa(ARG1,NEW))) # label(just24) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 25 (all ARG1 all INS (affiliatedwith(ARG1,INS) -> agent_generic(INS))) # label(just26) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 26 (all INS all ARG2 (affiliatedwith(INS,ARG2) -> agent_generic(INS))) # label(just27) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 27 (all X all Y (affiliatedwith(X,Y) -> affiliatedwith(Y,X))) # label(just28) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 28 (all X -affiliatedwith(X,X)) # label(just29) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 29 (all X (isa(X,c_footballteam) -> footballteam(X))) # label(just30) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 30 (all X (footballteam(X) -> isa(X,c_footballteam))) # label(just31) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 31 (all ARG1 all ARG2 all ARG3 natfunction(f_instancewithrelationtofn(ARG1,ARG2,ARG3),c_instancewithrelationtofn)) # label(just32) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 32 (all ARG1 all ARG2 all ARG3 natargument(f_instancewithrelationtofn(ARG1,ARG2,ARG3),n_1,ARG1)) # label(just33) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 33 (all ARG1 all ARG2 all ARG3 natargument(f_instancewithrelationtofn(ARG1,ARG2,ARG3),n_2,ARG2)) # label(just34) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 34 (all ARG1 all ARG2 all ARG3 natargument(f_instancewithrelationtofn(ARG1,ARG2,ARG3),n_3,ARG3)) # label(just35) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 35 (all ARG1 all ARG2 all ARG3 thing(f_instancewithrelationtofn(ARG1,ARG2,ARG3))) # label(just36) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 36 (all ARG1 all INS (prettystring(ARG1,INS) -> controlcharacterfreestring(INS))) # label(just37) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 37 (all INS all ARG2 (prettystring(INS,ARG2) -> thing(INS))) # label(just38) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 38 -(exists X (mtvisible(c_englishmt) -> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X))) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98 39 -mtvisible(c_englishmt) | prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) # label(just1) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98 40 mtvisible(c_basekb) # label(just25) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 41 mtvisible(c_englishmt) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(38)].
% 0.44/0.98 Derived: prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege). [resolve(39,a,41,a)].
% 0.44/0.98 42 prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege). [resolve(39,a,41,a)].
% 0.44/0.98 43 -prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),A) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(38)].
% 0.44/0.98 44 -prettystring(A,B) | controlcharacterfreestring(B) # label(just37) # label(axiom). [clausify(36)].
% 0.44/0.98 Derived: $F. [resolve(42,a,43,a)].
% 0.44/0.98 45 -predicate(A) | genlpreds(A,A) # label(just9) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)].
% 0.44/0.98 46 -genlpreds(A,B) | predicate(B) # label(just4) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98 47 -genlpreds(A,B) | predicate(B) # label(just5) # label(axiom). [clausify(5)].
% 0.44/0.98 48 -genlpreds(A,B) | predicate(A) # label(just6) # label(axiom). [clausify(6)].
% 0.44/0.98 49 -genlpreds(A,B) | predicate(A) # label(just7) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)].
% 0.44/0.98 50 -predicate(A) | genlpreds(A,A) # label(just10) # label(axiom). [clausify(10)].
% 0.44/0.98 51 -footballteam(A) | isa(A,c_footballteam) # label(just31) # label(axiom). [clausify(30)].
% 0.44/0.98 52 -isa(A,c_footballteam) | footballteam(A) # label(just30) # label(axiom). [clausify(29)].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Auto_denials:
% 0.44/0.98 % copying label just29 to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/0.98 % copying label just2 to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_proofs, 3). % (Horn set with more than one neg. clause)
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98 Function symbol KB weights:
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/0.98 % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.44/0.98 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.44/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 0.000.
% 0.44/0.98 % Given clauses 0.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 1 mtvisible(c_englishmt) -> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) # label(just1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 38 -(exists X (mtvisible(c_englishmt) -> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X))) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 39 -mtvisible(c_englishmt) | prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) # label(just1) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98 41 mtvisible(c_englishmt) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(38)].
% 0.44/0.98 42 prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege). [resolve(39,a,41,a)].
% 0.44/0.98 43 -prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),A) # label(query35) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(38)].
% 0.44/0.98 61 $F. [resolve(42,a,43,a)].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Disable descendants (x means already disabled):
% 0.44/0.98 0x 43x
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Given=8. Generated=12. Kept=8. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98 Usable=8. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=42. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.44/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 SEARCH FAILED
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Process 1296 exit (sos_empty) Sat Jun 11 02:11:25 2022
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------