TSTP Solution File: CSR032+4 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : CSR032+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:40:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 11.40s 2.61s
% Output : Refutation 11.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 9 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f159825,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f159824,f92428]) ).
fof(f92428,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14987]) ).
fof(f14987,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_14987) ).
fof(f159824,plain,
~ individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(resolution,[],[f159823,f114672]) ).
fof(f114672,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72286]) ).
fof(f72286,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3928]) ).
fof(f3928,axiom,
! [X0] :
( individual(X0)
=> trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_3928) ).
fof(f159823,plain,
~ trajector_underspecified(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(resolution,[],[f114294,f81200]) ).
fof(f81200,plain,
! [X0] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61592]) ).
fof(f61592,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0)
& mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f44219]) ).
fof(f44219,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f44218]) ).
fof(f44218,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f44217]) ).
fof(f44217,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query182) ).
fof(f114294,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71908]) ).
fof(f71908,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f50550]) ).
fof(f50550,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f41455]) ).
fof(f41455,axiom,
! [X15] :
( trajector_underspecified(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_41455) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR032+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:25:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % (11067)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.93/1.10 % (11074)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11070)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.93/1.10 % (11068)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11069)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11071)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11070)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11072)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.93/1.10 % (11073)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 7.09/2.01 TRYING [1]
% 9.69/2.39 TRYING [1]
% 11.40/2.59 % (11073)First to succeed.
% 11.40/2.60 % (11073)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-11067"
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 11.40/2.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.40/2.61 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)------------------------------
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Termination reason: Refutation
% 11.40/2.61
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Memory used [KB]: 86347
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Time elapsed: 1.492 s
% 11.40/2.61 % (11073)Instructions burned: 4343 (million)
% 11.40/2.61 % (11067)Success in time 2.261 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------