TSTP Solution File: CSR032+3 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:11:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 152.50s 20.89s
% Output : CNFRefutation 152.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn 9 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f496,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_496) ).
fof(f3775,axiom,
! [X0] :
( individual(X0)
=> trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3775) ).
fof(f6993,axiom,
! [X14] :
( trajector_underspecified(X14)
=> isa(X14,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_6993) ).
fof(f8006,conjecture,
? [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query132) ).
fof(f8007,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X22) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8006]) ).
fof(f10717,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f6993]) ).
fof(f11726,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f8007]) ).
fof(f13956,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3775]) ).
fof(f16309,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10717]) ).
fof(f17119,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0)
& mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11726]) ).
fof(f17606,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f496]) ).
fof(f20830,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13956]) ).
fof(f23605,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16309]) ).
fof(f24407,plain,
! [X0] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17119]) ).
cnf(c_535,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17606]) ).
cnf(c_3759,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20830]) ).
cnf(c_6534,plain,
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23605]) ).
cnf(c_7335,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24407]) ).
cnf(c_14289,plain,
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_6534]) ).
cnf(c_16061,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3759]) ).
cnf(c_53012,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16061,c_14289]) ).
cnf(c_109445,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_53012]) ).
cnf(c_163959,plain,
isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),c_trajector_underspecified),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_109445,c_535]) ).
cnf(c_163962,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_163959,c_7335]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:19:13 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 152.50/20.89 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 152.50/20.89 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 ------ iProver source info
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 152.50/20.89 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 152.50/20.89 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 ------ Parsing...
% 152.50/20.89 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 243 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe:64:0s pe:128:0s pe:256:0s pe:512:0s pe:1024:0s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 152.50/20.89
% 152.50/20.89
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------