TSTP Solution File: CSR032+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : CSR032+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.93s 1.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   40
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (   6 unt;  35 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  20   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   20 (  19 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  15 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (;   8   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ natargument > natfunction > isa > genls > genlpreds > genlmt > genlinverse > disjointwith > transitivebinarypredicate > trajector_underspecified > thing > predicate > mtvisible > microtheory > location_underspecified > individual > collection > city > binarypredicate > f_citynamedfn > #nlpp > s_agen > n_2 > n_1 > c_universalvocabularymt > c_transitivebinarypredicate > c_trajector_underspecified > c_thing > c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt > c_location_underspecified > c_individual > c_humansociallifemt > c_genlmt > c_france > c_citynamedfn > c_basekb

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(mtvisible,type,
    mtvisible: $i > $o ).

tff(microtheory,type,
    microtheory: $i > $o ).

tff(genls,type,
    genls: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(genlpreds,type,
    genlpreds: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_thing,type,
    c_thing: $i ).

tff(collection,type,
    collection: $i > $o ).

tff(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt,type,
    c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt: $i ).

tff(binarypredicate,type,
    binarypredicate: $i > $o ).

tff(city,type,
    city: $i > $o ).

tff(genlmt,type,
    genlmt: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(location_underspecified,type,
    location_underspecified: $i > $o ).

tff(c_genlmt,type,
    c_genlmt: $i ).

tff(individual,type,
    individual: $i > $o ).

tff(isa,type,
    isa: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_transitivebinarypredicate,type,
    c_transitivebinarypredicate: $i ).

tff(predicate,type,
    predicate: $i > $o ).

tff(c_humansociallifemt,type,
    c_humansociallifemt: $i ).

tff(c_france,type,
    c_france: $i ).

tff(n_2,type,
    n_2: $i ).

tff(disjointwith,type,
    disjointwith: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(thing,type,
    thing: $i > $o ).

tff(c_individual,type,
    c_individual: $i ).

tff(trajector_underspecified,type,
    trajector_underspecified: $i > $o ).

tff(natfunction,type,
    natfunction: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_basekb,type,
    c_basekb: $i ).

tff(c_citynamedfn,type,
    c_citynamedfn: $i ).

tff(n_1,type,
    n_1: $i ).

tff(c_trajector_underspecified,type,
    c_trajector_underspecified: $i ).

tff(f_citynamedfn,type,
    f_citynamedfn: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(natargument,type,
    natargument: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_universalvocabularymt,type,
    c_universalvocabularymt: $i ).

tff(transitivebinarypredicate,type,
    transitivebinarypredicate: $i > $o ).

tff(c_location_underspecified,type,
    c_location_underspecified: $i ).

tff(s_agen,type,
    s_agen: $i ).

tff(genlinverse,type,
    genlinverse: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [OBJ] :
      ( individual(OBJ)
     => trajector_underspecified(OBJ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).

tff(f_41,axiom,
    ! [OBJ] :
      ( trajector_underspecified(OBJ)
     => location_underspecified(OBJ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just3) ).

tff(f_219,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( location_underspecified(X)
     => isa(X,c_location_underspecified) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just44) ).

tff(f_319,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [COL] :
        ( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
       => isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),COL) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query32) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [OBJ_3] :
      ( trajector_underspecified(OBJ_3)
      | ~ individual(OBJ_3) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    ! [OBJ_112] :
      ( location_underspecified(OBJ_112)
      | ~ trajector_underspecified(OBJ_112) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    ! [OBJ_3] :
      ( location_underspecified(OBJ_3)
      | ~ individual(OBJ_3) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_142]) ).

tff(c_151,plain,
    ! [X_119] :
      ( isa(X_119,c_location_underspecified)
      | ~ location_underspecified(X_119) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_219]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ! [COL_108] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),COL_108),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_319]) ).

tff(c_160,plain,
    ~ location_underspecified(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_138]) ).

tff(c_163,plain,
    ~ individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_160]) ).

tff(c_167,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_163]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : CSR032+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:24:51 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.93/1.93  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.93/1.93  
% 3.93/1.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.93/1.96  
% 3.93/1.96  Inference rules
% 3.93/1.96  ----------------------
% 3.93/1.96  #Ref     : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Sup     : 4
% 3.93/1.96  #Fact    : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Define  : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Split   : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Chain   : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Close   : 0
% 3.93/1.96  
% 3.93/1.96  Ordering : KBO
% 3.93/1.96  
% 3.93/1.96  Simplification rules
% 3.93/1.96  ----------------------
% 3.93/1.96  #Subsume      : 14
% 3.93/1.96  #Demod        : 1
% 3.93/1.96  #Tautology    : 1
% 3.93/1.96  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.93/1.96  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.93/1.96  
% 3.93/1.96  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.93/1.96  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.93/1.96  
% 3.93/1.96  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.93/1.96  ----------------------
% 3.93/1.96  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 3.93/1.96  Parsing              : 0.34
% 3.93/1.96  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.93/1.96  Main loop            : 0.26
% 3.93/1.96  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 3.93/1.96  Reduction            : 0.08
% 3.93/1.96  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.93/1.96  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.93/1.96  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.93/1.96  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.93/1.96  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.93/1.96  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.93/1.96  Total                : 0.91
% 3.93/1.96  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.93/1.96  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.93/1.96  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.93/1.96  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------