TSTP Solution File: CSR031+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR031+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(just4,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).
fof(just34,axiom,
! [X9,X8] :
( disjointwith(X9,X8)
=> collection(X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just34) ).
fof(query31,conjecture,
~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query31) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X35] :
( ~ collection(X35)
| ~ individual(X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ~ disjointwith(X27,X28)
| collection(X27) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just34])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ collection(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR031+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:36:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # new_bool_1 with pid 10363 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 10365 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 56
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 42
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.19/0.46 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.19/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.19/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.19/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.19/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.19/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1164
% 0.19/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 341
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.19/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------