TSTP Solution File: CSR030+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR030+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 73.79s 66.90s
% Output : CNFRefutation 73.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2849,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_2849) ).
cnf(i_0_137,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_137) ).
cnf(i_0_3745,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_3745) ).
cnf(i_0_3744,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_3744) ).
cnf(i_0_1678,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_1678) ).
cnf(i_0_3707,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_3707) ).
cnf(i_0_2025,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ele_bc4o/input.p',i_0_2025) ).
cnf(c_0_3753,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2849 ).
cnf(c_0_3754,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
i_0_137 ).
cnf(c_0_3755,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
i_0_3745 ).
cnf(c_0_3756,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
i_0_3744 ).
cnf(c_0_3757,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1678 ).
cnf(c_0_3758,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
i_0_3707 ).
cnf(c_0_3759,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3753,c_0_3754]),c_0_3755])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3760,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3756,c_0_3757]) ).
cnf(c_0_3761,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2025 ).
cnf(c_0_3762,plain,
tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3758,c_0_3759])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3763,plain,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3760,c_0_3761]) ).
cnf(c_0_3764,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3762,c_0_3763]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR030+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 09:05:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 63.06/63.34 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 63.06/63.34 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 63.06/63.34 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 63.06/63.34 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 73.79/66.90 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 73.79/66.90 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 73.79/66.90 # Preprocessing time : 0.063 s
% 73.79/66.90
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof found!
% 73.79/66.90 # SZS status Theorem
% 73.79/66.90 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object total steps : 19
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 73.79/66.90 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 73.79/66.90 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 73.79/66.90 # Parsed axioms : 3745
% 73.79/66.90 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Initial clauses : 3745
% 73.79/66.90 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3745
% 73.79/66.90 # Processed clauses : 3777
% 73.79/66.90 # ...of these trivial : 176
% 73.79/66.90 # ...subsumed : 93
% 73.79/66.90 # ...remaining for further processing : 3508
% 73.79/66.90 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Backward-rewritten : 67
% 73.79/66.90 # Generated clauses : 9225
% 73.79/66.90 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8815
% 73.79/66.90 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 73.79/66.90 # Paramodulations : 9224
% 73.79/66.90 # Factorizations : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Current number of processed clauses : 3440
% 73.79/66.90 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2492
% 73.79/66.90 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 73.79/66.90 # Non-unit-clauses : 931
% 73.79/66.90 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8679
% 73.79/66.90 # ...number of literals in the above : 14481
% 73.79/66.90 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Current number of archived clauses : 68
% 73.79/66.90 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109024
% 73.79/66.90 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 97485
% 73.79/66.90 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 94
% 73.79/66.90 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15124
% 73.79/66.90 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # BW rewrite match attempts : 689
% 73.79/66.90 # BW rewrite match successes : 33
% 73.79/66.90 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Condensation successes : 0
% 73.79/66.90 # Termbank termtop insertions : 117671
% 73.79/66.90
% 73.79/66.90 # -------------------------------------------------
% 73.79/66.90 # User time : 0.202 s
% 73.79/66.90 # System time : 0.019 s
% 73.79/66.90 # Total time : 0.221 s
% 73.79/66.90 # ...preprocessing : 0.063 s
% 73.79/66.90 # ...main loop : 0.158 s
% 73.79/66.90 # Maximum resident set size: 32708 pages
% 73.79/66.90
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------