TSTP Solution File: CSR030+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:54:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 3 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 28 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f112,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f102,f107,f111]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f110]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f109,f92]) ).
fof(f92,plain,
! [X0] : ~ tptptypes_5_387(X0,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X0,c_pushingwithopenhand)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X0,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f59,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f58]) ).
fof(f58,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query30) ).
fof(f109,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(c_tptpcol_16_4451,c_pushingwithopenhand)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f108,f86]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X0)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X0)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f79]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X0,X1)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X0,X1)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).
fof(f108,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_4451,c_pushingwithopenhand)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f97,f93]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X0)
| tptptypes_6_388(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X0,X1)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f76]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X0)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X0,X1)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).
fof(f97,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f104,f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f104,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f103,f91]) ).
fof(f91,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
| mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f88,f89]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just11) ).
fof(f88,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ genlmt(X1,X0)
| mtvisible(X0)
| ~ mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X0)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X0)
| ~ mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f80,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( mtvisible(X0)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X0)
| ~ mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ( genlmt(X1,X0)
& mtvisible(X1) )
=> mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f49,axiom,
! [X15,X14] :
( ( mtvisible(X14)
& genlmt(X14,X15) )
=> mtvisible(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just49) ).
fof(f102,plain,
( spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f87,f99,f95]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
=> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 18:02:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Time elapsed: 0.034 s
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (11251)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (11243)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11243)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Time elapsed: 0.037 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11243)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11236)Success in time 0.145 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------