TSTP Solution File: CSR030+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:23:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS derived 28 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 71 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS allocated 97709 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 13 :
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)*.
% 0.19/0.44  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  13[0:Inp] || tptptypes_5_387(u,c_pushingwithopenhand)*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.44  14[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)+ -> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)*.
% 0.19/0.44  47[0:Inp] || tptptypes_6_388(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_5_387(u,v)*.
% 0.19/0.44  48[0:Inp] || tptptypes_7_389(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_6_388(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.44  50[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.19/0.44  60[0:Res:1.0,50.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,u)+ -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.19/0.44  61[0:Res:47.1,13.0] || tptptypes_6_388(u,c_pushingwithopenhand)*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.44  102[0:Res:12.0,60.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 0.19/0.44  109[0:MRR:14.0,102.0] ||  -> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)*.
% 0.19/0.44  111[0:Res:109.0,48.0] ||  -> tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_4451,c_pushingwithopenhand)*.
% 0.19/0.44  114[0:MRR:111.0,61.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : query30 just11 just12 just7 just9 just49
% 0.19/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------