TSTP Solution File: CSR030+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 16 ~; 11 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query30,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',query30) ).
fof(just7,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',just7) ).
fof(just9,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',just9) ).
fof(just12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
=> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',just12) ).
fof(just49,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( mtvisible(X15)
& genlmt(X15,X16) )
=> mtvisible(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',just49) ).
fof(just11,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p',just11) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query30]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X17] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
& ~ tptptypes_5_387(X17,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X18,X19)
| tptptypes_5_387(X18,X19) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X26,X27] :
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X26,X27)
| tptptypes_6_388(X27,X26) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just9])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( ~ mtvisible(X24)
| ~ genlmt(X24,X25)
| mtvisible(X25) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just49])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_4451,c_pushingwithopenhand)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : CSR030+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:14:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0fHA6WPJnV/E---3.1_8846.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 8925 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8928 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 58
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 43
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1354
% 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 371
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1892 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------