TSTP Solution File: CSR029+6 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR029+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 79.25s 72.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 79.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (   0 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2664,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_2664) ).

cnf(i_0_316,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_316) ).

cnf(i_0_3629,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_3629) ).

cnf(i_0_958,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_958) ).

cnf(i_0_2652,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_2652) ).

cnf(i_0_1301,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_1301) ).

cnf(i_0_458,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_458) ).

cnf(i_0_1989,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_1989) ).

cnf(i_0_3408,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_3408) ).

cnf(i_0_3628,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66z9diq2/lgb.p',i_0_3628) ).

cnf(c_0_3640,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2664 ).

cnf(c_0_3641,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_316 ).

cnf(c_0_3642,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
    i_0_3629 ).

cnf(c_0_3643,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_958 ).

cnf(c_0_3644,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3640,c_0_3641]),c_0_3642])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3645,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_2652 ).

cnf(c_0_3646,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_1301 ).

cnf(c_0_3647,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    i_0_458 ).

cnf(c_0_3648,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_1989 ).

cnf(c_0_3649,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3640,c_0_3643]),c_0_3644])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3650,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3645,c_0_3646]) ).

cnf(c_0_3651,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3647,c_0_3642])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3652,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    i_0_3408 ).

cnf(c_0_3653,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
    i_0_3628 ).

cnf(c_0_3654,plain,
    geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3648,c_0_3649])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3655,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3650,c_0_3651]) ).

cnf(c_0_3656,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3652,c_0_3642])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3657,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3653,c_0_3654])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3658,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3655,c_0_3656]),c_0_3657]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR029+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 17:33:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 68.42/68.74  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 68.42/68.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 68.42/68.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 68.42/68.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 79.25/72.17  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 79.25/72.17  # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 79.25/72.17  # Trying AutoSched0 for 116 seconds
% 79.25/72.17  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S033N
% 79.25/72.17  # and selection function PSelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 79.25/72.17  #
% 79.25/72.17  # Preprocessing time       : 0.045 s
% 79.25/72.17  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 79.25/72.17  
% 79.25/72.17  # Proof found!
% 79.25/72.17  # SZS status Theorem
% 79.25/72.17  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 79.25/72.17  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 79.25/72.17  
% 79.25/72.17  # -------------------------------------------------
% 79.25/72.17  # User time                : 0.189 s
% 79.25/72.17  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 79.25/72.17  # Total time               : 0.202 s
% 79.25/72.17  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 79.25/72.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------