TSTP Solution File: CSR029+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 31.82s 32.00s
% Output : Refutation 31.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:46:53 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 31.82/32.00
% 31.82/32.00 SPASS V 3.9
% 31.82/32.00 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 31.82/32.00 % SZS status Theorem
% 31.82/32.00 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.82/32.00 SPASS derived 39180 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 36189 clauses.
% 31.82/32.00 SPASS allocated 124702 KBytes.
% 31.82/32.00 SPASS spent 0:0:30.07 on the problem.
% 31.82/32.00 0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 31.82/32.00 0:00:00.19 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 31.82/32.00 0:00:00.63 for inferences.
% 31.82/32.00 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 31.82/32.00 0:0:26.82 for the reduction.
% 31.82/32.00
% 31.82/32.00
% 31.82/32.00 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 23 :
% 31.82/32.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 31.82/32.00 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 122[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*l.
% 31.82/32.00 173[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt)*l.
% 31.82/32.00 327[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) -> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)*.
% 31.82/32.00 473[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)* -> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39).
% 31.82/32.00 480[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39).
% 31.82/32.00 996[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 31.82/32.00 999[0:Inp] || geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)* inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) -> .
% 31.82/32.00 1007[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* -> inregion(v,u).
% 31.82/32.00 1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 31.82/32.00 1109[0:Inp] || inregion(u,v)* inregion(v,w)* -> inregion(u,w)*.
% 31.82/32.00 1134[0:MRR:480.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)*l.
% 31.82/32.00 1135[0:MRR:473.0,1.0] || -> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)*l.
% 31.82/32.00 1137[0:Res:1134.0,1007.0] || -> inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)*r.
% 31.82/32.00 4220[0:Res:122.0,996.0] || -> microtheory(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 5132[0:Res:327.1,999.0] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)* inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) -> .
% 31.82/32.00 5222[0:Res:173.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) || -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 5232[0:Res:122.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 5330[0:SSi:5232.0,1.0,4220.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 5331[0:MRR:5222.0,5330.0] || -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 31.82/32.00 5349[0:MRR:5132.0,5331.0] || inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)*l -> .
% 31.82/32.00 40829[0:NCh:1109.2,1109.0,5349.0,1135.0] || inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)*r -> .
% 31.82/32.00 40830[0:MRR:40829.0,1137.0] || -> .
% 31.82/32.00 % SZS output end Refutation
% 31.82/32.00 Formulae used in the proof : query79 ax1_212 ax1_326 ax1_121 ax1_282 ax1_337 ax1_1127 ax1_128 ax1_1123 ax1_933
% 31.82/32.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------