TSTP Solution File: CSR029+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query79,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query79) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_337,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_337) ).
fof(ax1_121,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_121) ).
fof(ax1_212,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_212) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(ax1_933,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( inregion(X13,X14)
& inregion(X14,X19) )
=> inregion(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_933) ).
fof(ax1_282,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_282) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query79]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ mtvisible(X22)
| ~ genlmt(X22,X23)
| mtvisible(X23) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
& ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_337]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_121]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_212]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X7,X8)
| inregion(X8,X7) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ inregion(X20,X21)
| ~ inregion(X21,X22)
| inregion(X20,X22) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_933])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_282]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X3,X2)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:45:53 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 36
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 12
% 0.25/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1113
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses : 20
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.25/1.44 # Processed clauses : 37
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.25/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Generated clauses : 32
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 20
% 0.25/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Paramodulations : 32
% 0.25/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.25/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8309
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.25/1.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 5144 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------