TSTP Solution File: CSR029+2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:31:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.45s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query79,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',query79) ).
fof(ax1_337,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_337) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_121,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_121) ).
fof(ax1_212,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_212) ).
fof(ax1_933,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( inregion(X13,X14)
& inregion(X14,X19) )
=> inregion(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_933) ).
fof(ax1_282,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_282) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p',ax1_326) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query79]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_337])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
& ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X32,X33] :
( ~ mtvisible(X32)
| ~ genlmt(X32,X33)
| mtvisible(X33) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X22,X23)
| inregion(X23,X22) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_121])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_212]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X28,X29,X30] :
( ~ inregion(X28,X29)
| ~ inregion(X29,X30)
| inregion(X28,X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_933])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( inregion(X2,X1)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_282])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( inregion(X1,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.19 % Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:05:08 EDT 2024
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ud5DaYvTJL/E---3.1_3633.p
% 0.45/0.65 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # new_bool_1 with pid 3791 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.65 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3794 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.65 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # Proof found!
% 0.45/0.65 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.45/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.65 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.45/0.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1107
% 0.45/0.65 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.45/0.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.45/0.65 # Processed clauses : 70
% 0.45/0.65 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.45/0.65 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 68
% 0.45/0.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.45/0.65 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.45/0.65 # Generated clauses : 37
% 0.45/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24
% 0.45/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Paramodulations : 37
% 0.45/0.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # NegExts : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.45/0.65 # ...of those cached : 9
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.45/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.45/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.45/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.45/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 29
% 0.45/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
% 0.45/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.45/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.45/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.45/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.45/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8838
% 0.45/0.65 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4931
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.65 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.45/0.65 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 4156 pages
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.65 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.45/0.65 # System time : 0.022 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.45/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.45/0.66 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------