TSTP Solution File: CSR029+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 26 ~; 21 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query29,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query29) ).
fof(just11,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just11) ).
fof(just49,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( mtvisible(X15)
& genlmt(X15,X16) )
=> mtvisible(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just49) ).
fof(just5,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
=> inregion(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just5) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just10) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just8) ).
fof(just9,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just9) ).
fof(just41,axiom,
! [X10,X11,X12] :
( ( inregion(X10,X11)
& inregion(X11,X12) )
=> inregion(X10,X12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just41) ).
fof(just12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just12) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query29]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just11]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
& ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ mtvisible(X17)
| ~ genlmt(X17,X18)
| mtvisible(X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just49])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X4)
| inregion(X4,X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just9]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15] :
( ~ inregion(X13,X14)
| ~ inregion(X14,X15)
| inregion(X13,X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X3,X2)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:41:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.25/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 58
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 49
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1019
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2756 pages
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 58
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 59
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 59
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 101
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 87
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 71
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 59
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 71
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 81
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 38
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 177
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 456
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3395
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2972 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------