%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : CSR028+5 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 06:03:41 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 99.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 103.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   3   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(12,axiom,
    individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
    file('/tmp/tmp74roDA/sel_CSR028+5.p_1',ax4_195384) ).

fof(29,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
   => individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
    file('/tmp/tmp74roDA/sel_CSR028+5.p_1',query228) ).

fof(30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
     => individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[29]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

fof(85,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
    & ~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

cnf(86,negated_conjecture,
    ~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[85]) ).

cnf(89,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[86,46,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(90,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[89,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(91,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    90,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR028+5.p
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+4.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp74roDA/sel_CSR028+5.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem CSR028+5.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR028+5.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR028+5.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------