TSTP Solution File: CSR025+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : CSR025+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 5.46s 1.68s
% Output : Proof 7.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : CSR025+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 11:02:09 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.63 ________ _____
% 0.23/0.63 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.23/0.63 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.23/0.63 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.23/0.63 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.23/0.63 (2023-06-19)
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.23/0.63 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.23/0.63 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.23/0.63 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.23/0.65 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.23/0.69 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.23/0.70 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.88/1.18 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.18 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.24 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.24 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.24 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.24 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.88/1.25 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.69/1.60 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.69/1.60 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.46/1.68 Prover 5: proved (977ms)
% 5.46/1.68
% 5.46/1.68 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.46/1.68
% 5.46/1.70 Prover 2: stopped
% 5.46/1.71 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.46/1.72 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.16/1.78 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.16/1.80 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.43/1.83 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.43/1.83 Prover 3: stopped
% 6.43/1.84 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.43/1.84 Prover 6: stopped
% 6.53/1.85 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.53/1.87 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.53/1.90 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.96/1.92 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.96/1.92 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.27/1.99 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.27/2.01 Prover 7: Found proof (size 4)
% 7.27/2.01 Prover 7: proved (310ms)
% 7.27/2.01 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.27/2.01 Prover 0: stopped
% 7.27/2.03 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.27/2.04 Prover 10: stopped
% 7.27/2.04 Prover 11: stopped
% 7.76/2.06 Prover 1: stopped
% 7.76/2.06 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.76/2.09 Prover 4: stopped
% 7.76/2.12 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.76/2.15 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.76/2.17 Prover 8: stopped
% 7.76/2.17
% 7.76/2.17 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.76/2.17
% 7.76/2.17 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.76/2.18 Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.76/2.18 ---------------------------------
% 7.76/2.18
% 7.76/2.18 (just4)
% 7.76/2.19 $i(c_tptpcol_15_130931) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_130933) & genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,
% 7.76/2.19 c_tptpcol_15_130931)
% 7.76/2.19
% 7.76/2.19 (query25)
% 7.76/2.19 $i(c_tptpcol_15_130931) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_130933) & $i(c_patterndetectormt) &
% 7.76/2.19 mtvisible(c_patterndetectormt) & ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,
% 7.76/2.19 c_tptpcol_15_130931)
% 7.76/2.19
% 7.76/2.19 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 7.76/2.19 --------------------------------------------
% 7.76/2.19 just1, just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18,
% 7.76/2.19 just19, just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27,
% 7.76/2.19 just28, just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33, just34, just35, just36,
% 7.76/2.19 just37, just38, just39, just40, just41, just42, just43, just44, just45, just46,
% 7.76/2.19 just47, just48, just49, just5, just50, just51, just52, just53, just6, just7,
% 7.76/2.19 just8, just9
% 7.76/2.19
% 7.76/2.19 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 7.76/2.19 ---------------------------------
% 7.76/2.19
% 7.76/2.19 Begin of proof
% 7.76/2.19 |
% 7.76/2.19 | ALPHA: (query25) implies:
% 7.76/2.19 | (1) ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933, c_tptpcol_15_130931)
% 7.76/2.19 |
% 7.76/2.19 | ALPHA: (just4) implies:
% 7.76/2.19 | (2) genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933, c_tptpcol_15_130931)
% 7.76/2.19 |
% 7.76/2.19 | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (2) imply:
% 7.76/2.19 | (3) $false
% 7.76/2.20 |
% 7.76/2.20 | CLOSE: (3) is inconsistent.
% 7.76/2.20 |
% 7.76/2.20 End of proof
% 7.76/2.20 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.76/2.20
% 7.76/2.20 1562ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------