TSTP Solution File: CSR009+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CSR009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:17:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.51s 0.69s
% Output   : Refutation 0.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   52 (  29 unt;   7 nHn;  49 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   90 (  17 equ;  45 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X,Y,Z)
    | less(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Z,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',stoppedin_defn) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X,Y,Z)
    | less('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Z,Y),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',stoppedin_defn) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ happens(X,Y)
    | ~ initiates(X,Z,Y)
    | ~ less(n0,U)
    | ~ trajectory(Z,Y,V,U)
    | stoppedIn(Y,Z,plus(Y,U))
    | holdsAt(V,plus(Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',change_holding) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X,Y)
    | releasedAt(X,plus(Y,n1))
    | happens('SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X),Y)
    | holdsAt(X,plus(Y,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',keep_holding) ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( releasedAt(X,Y)
    | releases('SKOLEMAAAV8'(Y,X),X,Y)
    | ~ releasedAt(X,plus(Y,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',keep_not_released) ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ happens(X,Y)
    | ~ initiates(X,Z,Y)
    | holdsAt(Z,plus(Y,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',happens_holds) ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( ~ happens(X,Y)
    | ~ initiates(X,Z,Y)
    | ~ releasedAt(Z,plus(Y,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax',happens_not_released) ).

cnf(43,axiom,
    ( initiates(X,Y,Z)
    | X != tapOn
    | Y != filling ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',initiates_all_defn) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ releases(X,Y,Z)
    | Y = waterLevel('SKOLEMAAAV11'(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',releases_all_defn) ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ happens(X,Y)
    | Y = n0
    | holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',happens_all_defn) ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( happens(X,Y)
    | X != tapOn
    | Y != n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',happens_all_defn) ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    ( ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(X),Y)
    | Z != plus(X,U)
    | trajectory(filling,Y,waterLevel(Z),U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',change_of_waterLevel) ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    ( ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(X),Y)
    | ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(Z),Y)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',same_waterLevel) ).

cnf(68,axiom,
    filling != waterLevel(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',filling_not_waterLevel) ).

cnf(74,axiom,
    plus(n0,n1) = n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus0_1) ).

cnf(77,axiom,
    plus(n1,n1) = n2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus1_1) ).

cnf(83,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X,Y)
    | less(X,Y)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal) ).

cnf(85,axiom,
    ( less_or_equal(X,Y)
    | X != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal) ).

cnf(86,axiom,
    ~ less(X,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less0) ).

cnf(87,axiom,
    ( ~ less(X,n1)
    | less_or_equal(X,n0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less1) ).

cnf(88,axiom,
    ( less(X,n1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X,n0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less1) ).

cnf(90,axiom,
    ( less(X,n2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X,n1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less2) ).

cnf(92,axiom,
    ( less(X,n3)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X,n2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less3) ).

cnf(105,axiom,
    ( ~ less(X,Y)
    | ~ less(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_property) ).

cnf(106,axiom,
    ( ~ less(X,Y)
    | X != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_property) ).

cnf(108,hypothesis,
    holdsAt(waterLevel(n0),n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',waterLevel_0) ).

cnf(114,negated_conjecture,
    ~ holdsAt(filling,n2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',filling_2) ).

cnf(115,plain,
    less_or_equal(X,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[85,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    happens(tapOn,n0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[61,theory(equality),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    initiates(tapOn,filling,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[43,theory(equality),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(151,plain,
    ~ releases(X,filling,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[53,68]) ).

cnf(179,plain,
    trajectory(filling,n0,waterLevel(n1),n1),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[63,108,74]) ).

cnf(217,plain,
    less(n2,n3),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[92,115]) ).

cnf(220,plain,
    less(n0,n1),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[88,115]) ).

cnf(231,plain,
    holdsAt(filling,n1),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,146,132]),74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(232,plain,
    ~ releasedAt(filling,n1),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[23,146,132]),74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(251,plain,
    ~ less(n3,n2),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[105,217]) ).

cnf(259,plain,
    n0 != n1,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[106,220]) ).

cnf(260,plain,
    ( releasedAt(filling,n2)
    | happens('SKOLEMAAAV5'(n1,filling),n1) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,231]),114,77,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(262,plain,
    ~ releasedAt(filling,n2),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,232,151]),77,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(263,plain,
    happens('SKOLEMAAAV5'(n1,filling),n1),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[260,262]) ).

cnf(282,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(n3,n1),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[90,251]) ).

cnf(323,plain,
    n3 != n1,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[85,282]) ).

cnf(340,plain,
    ( stoppedIn(n0,filling,n1)
    | holdsAt(waterLevel(n1),n1) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,179,132,146,220]),74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(374,plain,
    holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),n1),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[58,263,259]) ).

cnf(483,plain,
    ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n1),n1),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,374,323]) ).

cnf(484,plain,
    stoppedIn(n0,filling,n1),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[340,483]) ).

cnf(492,plain,
    less('SKOLEMAAAV2'(n0,n1,filling),n1),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,484]) ).

cnf(493,plain,
    less(n0,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(n0,n1,filling)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,484]) ).

cnf(581,plain,
    less_or_equal('SKOLEMAAAV2'(n0,n1,filling),n0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[87,492]) ).

cnf(597,plain,
    n0 != 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(n0,n1,filling),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[106,493]) ).

cnf(693,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[83,581,86]),597]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CSR009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 16:58:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-10T16:58:08
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-10T16:58:08
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|plus| ?X ?Y) (|plus| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.19/0.50     |antitrajectory| is a 4-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.51/0.69  ; Declaring plus to be commutative.
% 0.51/0.69  
% 0.51/0.69  #||
% 0.51/0.69  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/0.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.51/0.70  ||#
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.51/0.70  ;      2508 formulas have been input or derived (from 425 formulas).
% 0.51/0.70  ;       693 (28%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.51/0.70  ;           52 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.51/0.70  ;          641 (92%) are still being kept.
% 0.51/0.70  ; 
% 0.51/0.70  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.012   6%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.005   2%   Assert                       (55 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.052  24%   Process new row              (2,083 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.065  31%   Resolution                   (848 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.010   5%   Paramodulation               (424 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (19 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.001   0%   Condensing                   (352 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Forward subsumption          (352 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Backward subsumption         (229 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.004   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (205 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.024  11%   Forward simplification       (2,072 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.005   2%   Backward simplification      (693 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (1,408 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.029  14%   Other
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.213        Total
% 0.51/0.70  ;     0.227        Real time
% 0.51/0.70  ; 
% 0.51/0.70  ; Term-hash-array has 819 terms in all.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 189 entries (192 at peak, 229 added, 40 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 758 nodes (758 at peak, 983 added, 225 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ;  Retrieved 221 possibly forward subsuming rows in 352 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ;  Retrieved 50 possibly backward subsumed rows in 229 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Path-index has 793 entries (793 at peak, 857 added, 64 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Path-index has 966 nodes (966 at peak, 1,026 added, 60 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Trie-index has 793 entries (793 at peak, 857 added, 64 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Trie-index has 1,573 nodes (1,573 at peak, 1,703 added, 130 deleted).
% 0.51/0.70  ; Retrieved 2,264 generalization terms in 3,754 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Retrieved 510 instance terms in 463 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; Retrieved 61,390 unifiable terms in 8,041 calls.
% 0.51/0.70  ; 
% 0.51/0.70  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.51/0.70  ;     1 with value 14              1 with value 22
% 0.51/0.70  ; The agenda of rows to give has 225 entries:
% 0.51/0.70  ;    25 with value (4 13)         21 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 24)
% 0.51/0.70  ;    50 with value (4 14)          7 with value (4 20)           3 with value (4 25)
% 0.51/0.70  ;    27 with value (4 15)          7 with value (4 21)           1 with value (4 29)
% 0.51/0.70  ;    25 with value (4 16)          5 with value (4 22)           1 with value (4 35)
% 0.51/0.70  ;    25 with value (4 17)          8 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.51/0.70  ;    16 with value (4 18)
% 0.51/0.70  Evaluation took:
% 0.51/0.70    0.227 seconds of real time
% 0.51/0.70    0.210014 seconds of user run time
% 0.51/0.70    0.017194 seconds of system run time
% 0.51/0.70    [Run times include 0.009 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.51/0.71    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.51/0.71    0 page faults and
% 0.51/0.71    14,771,120 bytes consed.
% 0.51/0.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.51/0.71  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-10T16:58:08
% 0.51/0.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.51/0.71  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------