TSTP Solution File: COM149+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : COM149+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:07:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.74s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 4 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 35 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_144,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_144) ).
cnf(i_0_147,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vempty,vvar(esk33_0),esk32_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_147) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
vvar(X1) != vabs(X2,X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vvar(X1) != vvar(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( X1 = vnoType
| X2 != X3
| X4 != vempty
| X1 != vlookup(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_135,plain,
( vlookup(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) = vsomeType(X2)
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_135) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
vsomeType(X1) != vnoType,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jp9b15yu/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_156,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_144 ).
cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vempty,vvar(esk33_0),esk32_0),
i_0_147 ).
cnf(c_0_158,plain,
vvar(X1) != vabs(X2,X3,X4),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_159,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_160,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vvar(X1) != vvar(X2) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
vvar(esk24_3(vvar(esk33_0),esk32_0,vempty)) = vvar(esk33_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157]),c_0_158]),c_0_159]) ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
( esk24_3(vvar(esk33_0),esk32_0,vempty) = X1
| vvar(esk33_0) != vvar(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_161]) ).
cnf(c_0_163,plain,
( X1 = vnoType
| X2 != X3
| X4 != vempty
| X1 != vlookup(X2,X4) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_164,plain,
( vlookup(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) = vsomeType(X2)
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_135 ).
cnf(c_0_165,plain,
esk24_3(vvar(esk33_0),esk32_0,vempty) = esk33_0,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_162]) ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
vlookup(X1,vempty) = vnoType,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_163])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_167,plain,
vsomeType(X1) != vnoType,
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_168,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_157]),c_0_165]),c_0_166]),c_0_158]),c_0_159]),c_0_167]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : COM149+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 20:29:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.74/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.74/2.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.74/2.46 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.74/2.46 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.74/2.46 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.74/2.46 #
% 7.74/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.74/2.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.74/2.46
% 7.74/2.46 # Proof found!
% 7.74/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.74/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.74/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.74/2.46
% 7.74/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.74/2.46 # User time : 0.033 s
% 7.74/2.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.74/2.46 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 7.74/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.74/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------