TSTP Solution File: COM144+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : COM144+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:42:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.79s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  18   ~;   7   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   4 sgn;  50   !;  15   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38,axiom,
    ! [X3] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-noExp-someExp') ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X3,X18] :
      ( vabs(X8,X9,X10) = X3
     => ( vreduce(X3) = X18
       => vnoExp = X18 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduce1) ).

fof(f60,conjecture,
    ! [X8,X9,X19,X34,X14] :
      ( ( vtcheck(X19,vabs(X8,X9,ve1),X14)
        & vsomeExp(X34) = vreduce(vabs(X8,X9,ve1)) )
     => vtcheck(X19,X34,X14) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Preservation-T-abs') ).

fof(f61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X8,X9,X19,X34,X14] :
        ( ( vtcheck(X19,vabs(X8,X9,ve1),X14)
          & vsomeExp(X34) = vreduce(vabs(X8,X9,ve1)) )
       => vtcheck(X19,X34,X14) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( vabs(X0,X1,X2) = X3
     => ( vreduce(X3) = X4
       => vnoExp = X4 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X0,X1,ve1),X4)
          & vsomeExp(X3) = vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,ve1)) )
       => vtcheck(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( vnoExp = X4
      | vreduce(X3) != X4
      | vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( vnoExp = X4
      | vreduce(X3) != X4
      | vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3 ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f175]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ vtcheck(X2,X3,X4)
      & vtcheck(X2,vabs(X0,X1,ve1),X4)
      & vsomeExp(X3) = vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,ve1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ vtcheck(X2,X3,X4)
      & vtcheck(X2,vabs(X0,X1,ve1),X4)
      & vsomeExp(X3) = vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,ve1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f207]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ~ vtcheck(X2,X3,X4)
        & vtcheck(X2,vabs(X0,X1,ve1),X4)
        & vsomeExp(X3) = vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,ve1)) )
   => ( ~ vtcheck(sK89,sK90,sK91)
      & vtcheck(sK89,vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1),sK91)
      & vsomeExp(sK90) = vreduce(vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f297,plain,
    ( ~ vtcheck(sK89,sK90,sK91)
    & vtcheck(sK89,vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1),sK91)
    & vsomeExp(sK90) = vreduce(vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK87,sK88,sK89,sK90,sK91])],[f208,f296]) ).

fof(f392,plain,
    ! [X0] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f397,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( vnoExp = X4
      | vreduce(X3) != X4
      | vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

fof(f451,plain,
    vsomeExp(sK90) = vreduce(vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f297]) ).

fof(f542,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( vnoExp = vreduce(X3)
      | vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f397]) ).

fof(f543,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : vnoExp = vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,X2)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f542]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    vsomeExp(X0) != vnoExp,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f392]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    vreduce(vabs(X0,X1,X2)) = vnoExp,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f543]) ).

cnf(c_194,negated_conjecture,
    vreduce(vabs(sK87,sK88,ve1)) = vsomeExp(sK90),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f451]) ).

cnf(c_974,plain,
    vsomeExp(sK90) = vnoExp,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_139]) ).

cnf(c_975,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_974,c_134]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COM144+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 13:23:13 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.79/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 2.79/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 2.79/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.79/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  ------ Parsing...
% 2.79/1.16  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  ------ Preprocessing...
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.79/1.16  
% 2.79/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------