TSTP Solution File: COM144+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : COM144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:53:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 35 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 20 ~; 9 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 75 ( 55 !; 20 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f610,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f609,f415]) ).
fof(f415,plain,
! [X0] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
! [X0] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X0),
inference(rectify,[],[f38]) ).
fof(f38,axiom,
! [X3] : vnoExp != vsomeExp(X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-noExp-someExp') ).
fof(f609,plain,
vnoExp = vsomeExp(sK55),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f433,f514]) ).
fof(f514,plain,
! [X0,X1,X4] : vnoExp = vreduce(vabs(X1,X4,X0)),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f513]) ).
fof(f513,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
( vreduce(vabs(X1,X4,X0)) != X2
| vnoExp = X2 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f362]) ).
fof(f362,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( vabs(X1,X4,X0) != X3
| vreduce(X3) != X2
| vnoExp = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f245]) ).
fof(f245,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( vabs(X1,X4,X0) != X3
| vreduce(X3) != X2
| vnoExp = X2 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f131]) ).
fof(f131,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X4,X3] :
( vabs(X0,X3,X2) != X4
| vreduce(X4) != X1
| vnoExp = X1 ),
inference(flattening,[],[f130]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
! [X3,X0,X4,X1,X2] :
( vnoExp = X1
| vreduce(X4) != X1
| vabs(X0,X3,X2) != X4 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
! [X3,X0,X4,X1,X2] :
( vabs(X0,X3,X2) = X4
=> ( vreduce(X4) = X1
=> vnoExp = X1 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,axiom,
! [X8,X18,X10,X9,X3] :
( vabs(X8,X9,X10) = X3
=> ( vreduce(X3) = X18
=> vnoExp = X18 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduce1) ).
fof(f433,plain,
vsomeExp(sK55) = vreduce(vabs(sK57,sK54,ve1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f298]) ).
fof(f298,plain,
( vsomeExp(sK55) = vreduce(vabs(sK57,sK54,ve1))
& ~ vtcheck(sK56,sK55,sK53)
& vtcheck(sK56,vabs(sK57,sK54,ve1),sK53) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56,sK57])],[f296,f297]) ).
fof(f297,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( vsomeExp(X2) = vreduce(vabs(X4,X1,ve1))
& ~ vtcheck(X3,X2,X0)
& vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X1,ve1),X0) )
=> ( vsomeExp(sK55) = vreduce(vabs(sK57,sK54,ve1))
& ~ vtcheck(sK56,sK55,sK53)
& vtcheck(sK56,vabs(sK57,sK54,ve1),sK53) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f296,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( vsomeExp(X2) = vreduce(vabs(X4,X1,ve1))
& ~ vtcheck(X3,X2,X0)
& vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X1,ve1),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f201]) ).
fof(f201,plain,
? [X3,X2,X0,X1,X4] :
( vreduce(vabs(X4,X2,ve1)) = vsomeExp(X0)
& ~ vtcheck(X1,X0,X3)
& vtcheck(X1,vabs(X4,X2,ve1),X3) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f200]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
? [X1,X3,X2,X0,X4] :
( ~ vtcheck(X1,X0,X3)
& vtcheck(X1,vabs(X4,X2,ve1),X3)
& vreduce(vabs(X4,X2,ve1)) = vsomeExp(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
~ ! [X1,X3,X2,X0,X4] :
( ( vtcheck(X1,vabs(X4,X2,ve1),X3)
& vreduce(vabs(X4,X2,ve1)) = vsomeExp(X0) )
=> vtcheck(X1,X0,X3) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f61,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X34,X19,X9,X14,X8] :
( ( vtcheck(X19,vabs(X8,X9,ve1),X14)
& vsomeExp(X34) = vreduce(vabs(X8,X9,ve1)) )
=> vtcheck(X19,X34,X14) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f60]) ).
fof(f60,conjecture,
! [X34,X19,X9,X14,X8] :
( ( vtcheck(X19,vabs(X8,X9,ve1),X14)
& vsomeExp(X34) = vreduce(vabs(X8,X9,ve1)) )
=> vtcheck(X19,X34,X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Preservation-T-abs') ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : COM144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 17:29:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.49 % (26401)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (26400)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (26427)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (26399)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (26406)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (26403)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (26402)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (26398)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26400)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.51 % (26407)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26403)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.51 % (26421)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26424)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26413)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26415)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26416)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 % (26414)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26410)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26418)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26404)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26408)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26417)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26423)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/500Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26422)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26420)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Termination phase: Naming
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52 % (26406)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53 % (26419)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.18/0.53 % (26405)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.53 % (26425)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.53
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53 % (26400)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53 % (26397)Success in time 0.19 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------