TSTP Solution File: COM144+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : COM144+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 10:03:43 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 14 ~; 7 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 10 sgn 27 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(12,axiom,
! [X8,X21,X16,X1,X20] :
( equal(X1,vabs(X8,X21,X16))
=> ( equal(X20,vreduce(X1))
=> equal(X20,vnoExp) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpgyTfJQ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',reduce1) ).
fof(27,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ equal(vnoExp,vsomeExp(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpgyTfJQ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','DIFF-noExp-someExp') ).
fof(35,conjecture,
! [X8,X21,X15,X29,X17] :
( ( equal(vreduce(vabs(X8,X21,ve1)),vsomeExp(X29))
& vtcheck(X15,vabs(X8,X21,ve1),X17) )
=> vtcheck(X15,X29,X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpgyTfJQ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','T-Preservation-T-abs') ).
fof(36,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X8,X21,X15,X29,X17] :
( ( equal(vreduce(vabs(X8,X21,ve1)),vsomeExp(X29))
& vtcheck(X15,vabs(X8,X21,ve1),X17) )
=> vtcheck(X15,X29,X17) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[35]) ).
fof(85,plain,
! [X8,X21,X16,X1,X20] :
( ~ equal(X1,vabs(X8,X21,X16))
| ~ equal(X20,vreduce(X1))
| equal(X20,vnoExp) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(86,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X26] :
( ~ equal(X25,vabs(X22,X23,X24))
| ~ equal(X26,vreduce(X25))
| equal(X26,vnoExp) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[85]) ).
cnf(87,plain,
( X1 = vnoExp
| X1 != vreduce(X2)
| X2 != vabs(X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[86]) ).
fof(138,plain,
! [X2] : ~ equal(vnoExp,vsomeExp(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
cnf(139,plain,
vnoExp != vsomeExp(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[138]) ).
fof(162,negated_conjecture,
? [X8,X21,X15,X29,X17] :
( equal(vreduce(vabs(X8,X21,ve1)),vsomeExp(X29))
& vtcheck(X15,vabs(X8,X21,ve1),X17)
& ~ vtcheck(X15,X29,X17) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
fof(163,negated_conjecture,
? [X30,X31,X32,X33,X34] :
( equal(vreduce(vabs(X30,X31,ve1)),vsomeExp(X33))
& vtcheck(X32,vabs(X30,X31,ve1),X34)
& ~ vtcheck(X32,X33,X34) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[162]) ).
fof(164,negated_conjecture,
( equal(vreduce(vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,ve1)),vsomeExp(esk7_0))
& vtcheck(esk6_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,ve1),esk8_0)
& ~ vtcheck(esk6_0,esk7_0,esk8_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[163]) ).
cnf(167,negated_conjecture,
vreduce(vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,ve1)) = vsomeExp(esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[164]) ).
cnf(178,plain,
( vnoExp = X1
| vreduce(vabs(X2,X3,X4)) != X1 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[87,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(225,plain,
vnoExp = vreduce(vabs(X1,X2,X3)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[178,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(229,negated_conjecture,
vnoExp = vsomeExp(esk7_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[167,225,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(230,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[229,139,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(231,negated_conjecture,
$false,
230,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COM144+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n017.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Mar 25 12:21:03 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.29 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.29 --creating new selector for [COM001+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.36 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpgyTfJQ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.36 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpgyTfJQ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.36 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.36 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.36 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.36 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.36 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------