TSTP Solution File: COM141+1 by E-SAT---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem : COM141+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:55:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 17 ~; 14 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 3 sgn 42 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('T-Weak-abs-1',axiom,
! [X9,X10,X20,X21,X35,X15] :
( ( X9 != X21
& vlookup(X9,X20) = vnoType
& vtcheck(X20,vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X9,X10,X20),vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oUhgRMOvQb/E---3.1_1639.p','T-Weak-abs-1') ).
fof('T-Weak-abs',conjecture,
! [X9,X10,X20,X21,X35,X15] :
( ( vlookup(X9,X20) = vnoType
& vtcheck(X20,vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X9,X10,X20),vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oUhgRMOvQb/E---3.1_1639.p','T-Weak-abs') ).
fof('T-Weak-abs-2',axiom,
! [X9,X10,X20,X21,X35,X15] :
( ( X9 = X21
& vlookup(X9,X20) = vnoType
& vtcheck(X20,vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X9,X10,X20),vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oUhgRMOvQb/E---3.1_1639.p','T-Weak-abs-2') ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X9,X10,X20,X21,X35,X15] :
( ( X9 != X21
& vlookup(X9,X20) = vnoType
& vtcheck(X20,vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X9,X10,X20),vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['T-Weak-abs-1']) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X9,X10,X20,X21,X35,X15] :
( ( vlookup(X9,X20) = vnoType
& vtcheck(X20,vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X9,X10,X20),vabs(X21,X35,veabs),X15) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['T-Weak-abs']) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X80,X81,X82,X83,X84,X85] :
( X80 != X83
| vlookup(X80,X82) != vnoType
| ~ vtcheck(X82,vabs(X83,X84,veabs),X85)
| vtcheck(vbind(X80,X81,X82),vabs(X83,X84,veabs),X85) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['T-Weak-abs-2'])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X74,X75,X76,X77,X78,X79] :
( X74 = X77
| vlookup(X74,X76) != vnoType
| ~ vtcheck(X76,vabs(X77,X78,veabs),X79)
| vtcheck(vbind(X74,X75,X76),vabs(X77,X78,veabs),X79) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( vlookup(esk1_0,esk3_0) = vnoType
& vtcheck(esk3_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0)
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( vtcheck(vbind(X1,X6,X3),vabs(X2,X4,veabs),X5)
| X1 != X2
| vlookup(X1,X3) != vnoType
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X2,X4,veabs),X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X6,X3),vabs(X2,X4,veabs),X5)
| vlookup(X1,X3) != vnoType
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X2,X4,veabs),X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(vbind(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6)
| vlookup(X1,X3) != vnoType
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
vlookup(esk1_0,esk3_0) = vnoType,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk3_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : COM141+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 23:24:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oUhgRMOvQb/E---3.1_1639.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 1728 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 168s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with pid 1734 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 168s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 58
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 33
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 38
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 63
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 63
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 26
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 29
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 39
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 31
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 96
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4358
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1214
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------