TSTP Solution File: COM138+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : COM138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:07:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.89s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 17 unt; 7 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 47 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_144,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_144) ).
cnf(i_0_146,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0),vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_146) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
vvar(X1) != vabs(X2,X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vvar(X1) != vvar(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = vlookup(X1,X4)
| X5 != X1
| X3 != vlookup(X5,X6)
| X6 != vbind(X2,X7,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(i_0_135,plain,
( vlookup(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) = vsomeType(X2)
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_135) ).
cnf(i_0_145,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk34_0,vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_145) ).
cnf(i_0_148,plain,
( vtcheck(X1,vvar(X2),X3)
| vlookup(X2,X1) != vsomeType(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_148) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X4 != X3
| X2 != vvar(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_147,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,vvar(esk35_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9t_u68kx/lgb.p',i_0_147) ).
cnf(c_0_160,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_144 ).
cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0),vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0),
i_0_146 ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
vvar(X1) != vabs(X2,X3,X4),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_163,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_164,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vvar(X1) != vvar(X2) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
vvar(esk24_3(vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0,vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0))) = vvar(esk35_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_161]),c_0_162]),c_0_163]) ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
( esk24_3(vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0,vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0)) = X1
| vvar(esk35_0) != vvar(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_165]) ).
cnf(c_0_167,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = vlookup(X1,X4)
| X5 != X1
| X3 != vlookup(X5,X6)
| X6 != vbind(X2,X7,X4) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_168,plain,
( vlookup(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) = vsomeType(X2)
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_135 ).
cnf(c_0_169,plain,
esk24_3(vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0,vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0)) = esk35_0,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_166]) ).
cnf(c_0_170,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk34_0,vvar(esk35_0),esk36_0),
i_0_145 ).
cnf(c_0_171,plain,
( vtcheck(X1,vvar(X2),X3)
| vlookup(X2,X1) != vsomeType(X3) ),
i_0_148 ).
cnf(c_0_172,plain,
( vlookup(X1,vbind(X2,X3,X4)) = vlookup(X1,X4)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_167])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_173,negated_conjecture,
vlookup(esk35_0,vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0)) = vsomeType(esk36_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_161]),c_0_169]),c_0_162]),c_0_163]) ).
cnf(c_0_174,negated_conjecture,
vlookup(esk35_0,esk34_0) != vsomeType(esk36_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_170,c_0_171]) ).
cnf(c_0_175,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X4 != X3
| X2 != vvar(X4) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_176,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,vvar(esk35_0)),
i_0_147 ).
cnf(c_0_177,plain,
esk32_0 = esk35_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_172,c_0_173]),c_0_174]) ).
cnf(c_0_178,plain,
visFreeVar(X1,vvar(X1)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_175])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_179,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_177]),c_0_178])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COM138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 19:25:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.89/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.89/2.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.89/2.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.89/2.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.89/2.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.89/2.39 #
% 7.89/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.89/2.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.89/2.39
% 7.89/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.89/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.89/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.89/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.89/2.39
% 7.89/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.89/2.39 # User time : 0.017 s
% 7.89/2.39 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.89/2.39 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 7.89/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.89/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------