TSTP Solution File: COM126+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : COM126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:07:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.29s 2.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 49 ( 20 unt; 13 nHn; 41 RR)
% Number of literals : 112 ( 44 equ; 52 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 127 ( 40 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_144,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_144) ).
cnf(i_0_149,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk34_0,vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_149) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
vabs(X1,X2,X3) != vapp(X4,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vapp(X1,X3) != vapp(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vapp(X3,X1) != vapp(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_124,plain,
( vtcheck(X1,vapp(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X2,varrow(X5,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_124) ).
cnf(i_0_151,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve1app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),ve1app,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve1app,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_151) ).
cnf(i_0_142,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vtcheck(X3,esk30_3(X1,X2,X3),esk31_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_142) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X2 != vapp(X4,X5)
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_39,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X2 != vapp(X4,X5)
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(i_0_152,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve2app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),ve2app,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve2app,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_152) ).
cnf(i_0_143,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vtcheck(X3,esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),varrow(esk31_3(X1,X2,X3),X2))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_143) ).
cnf(i_0_150,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,vapp(ve1app,ve2app)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_150) ).
cnf(i_0_148,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0),vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1x8tje8b/lgb.p',i_0_148) ).
cnf(c_0_168,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vapp(esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),esk30_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_144 ).
cnf(c_0_169,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk34_0,vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0),
i_0_149 ).
cnf(c_0_170,plain,
vabs(X1,X2,X3) != vapp(X4,X5),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_171,plain,
vvar(X1) != vapp(X2,X3),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_172,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vapp(X1,X3) != vapp(X2,X4) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_173,negated_conjecture,
vapp(esk29_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0),esk30_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0)) = vapp(ve1app,ve2app),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_169]),c_0_170]),c_0_171]) ).
cnf(c_0_174,plain,
( esk29_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0) = X1
| vapp(ve1app,ve2app) != vapp(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_172,c_0_173]) ).
cnf(c_0_175,plain,
esk29_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0) = ve1app,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_174]) ).
cnf(c_0_176,plain,
( X1 = X2
| vapp(X3,X1) != vapp(X4,X2) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_177,negated_conjecture,
vapp(ve1app,esk30_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0)) = vapp(ve1app,ve2app),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_173,c_0_175]) ).
cnf(c_0_178,plain,
( vtcheck(X1,vapp(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X2,varrow(X5,X4)) ),
i_0_124 ).
cnf(c_0_179,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve1app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),ve1app,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve1app,X4) ),
i_0_151 ).
cnf(c_0_180,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vtcheck(X3,esk30_3(X1,X2,X3),esk31_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_142 ).
cnf(c_0_181,plain,
( esk30_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0) = X1
| vapp(ve1app,ve2app) != vapp(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_177]) ).
cnf(c_0_182,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X2 != vapp(X4,X5)
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4) ),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_183,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X3 != X1
| X2 != vapp(X4,X5)
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X5) ),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_184,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve1app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vapp(ve1app,X4),X5)
| ~ vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),X4,X6)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve1app,varrow(X6,X5)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_178,c_0_179]) ).
cnf(c_0_185,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve2app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),ve2app,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve2app,X4) ),
i_0_152 ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
( vvar(esk24_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vabs(esk25_3(X1,X2,X3),esk27_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X1
| vtcheck(X3,esk29_3(X1,X2,X3),varrow(esk31_3(X1,X2,X3),X2))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_143 ).
cnf(c_0_187,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk34_0,esk30_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0),esk31_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_180,c_0_169]),c_0_170]),c_0_171]) ).
cnf(c_0_188,plain,
esk30_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0) = ve2app,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_181]) ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X2 != vapp(X3,X4)
| ~ visFreeVar(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_182]) ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| X2 != vapp(X3,X4)
| ~ visFreeVar(X1,X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_183]) ).
cnf(c_0_191,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve2app)
| visFreeVar(X1,ve1app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vapp(ve1app,ve2app),X4)
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve1app,varrow(X5,X4))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,ve2app,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_184,c_0_185]) ).
cnf(c_0_192,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk34_0,ve1app,varrow(esk31_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0),esk35_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_169]),c_0_170]),c_0_171]),c_0_175]) ).
cnf(c_0_193,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk34_0,ve2app,esk31_3(vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0,esk34_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188]) ).
cnf(c_0_194,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,vapp(ve1app,ve2app)),
i_0_150 ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,vapp(X2,X3))
| ~ visFreeVar(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,vapp(X2,X3))
| ~ visFreeVar(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_190]) ).
cnf(c_0_197,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(vbind(esk32_0,esk33_0,esk34_0),vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0),
i_0_148 ).
cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
( visFreeVar(X1,ve1app)
| visFreeVar(X1,ve2app)
| vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,esk34_0),vapp(ve1app,ve2app),esk35_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]),c_0_193])]) ).
cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,ve1app),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_195]) ).
cnf(c_0_200,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk32_0,ve2app),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_196]) ).
cnf(c_0_201,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_197,c_0_198]),c_0_199]),c_0_200]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COM126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 17:15:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.29/2.38 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.29/2.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.29/2.38 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.29/2.38 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C36_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 7.29/2.38 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.29/2.38 #
% 7.29/2.38 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.29/2.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.29/2.38
% 7.29/2.38 # Proof found!
% 7.29/2.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.29/2.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.29/2.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.29/2.38
% 7.29/2.38 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.29/2.38 # User time : 0.029 s
% 7.29/2.38 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.29/2.38 # Total time : 0.037 s
% 7.29/2.38 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.29/2.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------