TSTP Solution File: COM125+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : COM125+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 10:03:41 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 76 ( 30 ~; 22 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 3 sgn 66 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(24,axiom,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( ~ equal(X7,X11)
& ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpogKXte/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','T-Weak-FreeVar-abs-1') ).
fof(25,axiom,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( equal(X7,X11)
& ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpogKXte/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','T-Weak-FreeVar-abs-2') ).
fof(27,conjecture,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpogKXte/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','T-Weak-FreeVar-abs') ).
fof(29,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[27]) ).
fof(31,plain,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( ~ equal(X7,X11)
& ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[24,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(32,plain,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( equal(X7,X11)
& ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[25,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(34,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ( ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[29,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(122,plain,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( equal(X7,X11)
| visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16)
| vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
fof(123,plain,
! [X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
( equal(X24,X27)
| visFreeVar(X24,vabs(X27,X28,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X26,vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29)
| vtcheck(vbind(X24,X25,X26),vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[122]) ).
cnf(124,plain,
( vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6)
| visFreeVar(X1,vabs(X4,X5,veabs))
| X1 = X4
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[123]) ).
fof(125,plain,
! [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ~ equal(X7,X11)
| visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16)
| vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
fof(126,plain,
! [X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
( ~ equal(X24,X27)
| visFreeVar(X24,vabs(X27,X28,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X26,vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29)
| vtcheck(vbind(X24,X25,X26),vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[125]) ).
cnf(127,plain,
( vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6)
| visFreeVar(X1,vabs(X4,X5,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6)
| X1 != X4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[126]) ).
fof(131,negated_conjecture,
? [X7,X22,X14,X11,X23,X16] :
( ~ visFreeVar(X7,vabs(X11,X23,veabs))
& vtcheck(X14,vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16)
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(X7,X22,X14),vabs(X11,X23,veabs),X16) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
fof(132,negated_conjecture,
? [X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
( ~ visFreeVar(X24,vabs(X27,X28,veabs))
& vtcheck(X26,vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29)
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(X24,X25,X26),vabs(X27,X28,veabs),X29) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[131]) ).
fof(133,negated_conjecture,
( ~ visFreeVar(esk1_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs))
& vtcheck(esk3_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0)
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[132]) ).
cnf(134,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(vbind(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[133]) ).
cnf(135,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(esk3_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[133]) ).
cnf(136,negated_conjecture,
~ visFreeVar(esk1_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[133]) ).
cnf(182,plain,
( vtcheck(vbind(X1,X2,X3),vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6)
| visFreeVar(X1,vabs(X4,X5,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(X3,vabs(X4,X5,veabs),X6) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[127,124]) ).
cnf(183,negated_conjecture,
( visFreeVar(esk1_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs))
| ~ vtcheck(esk3_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs),esk6_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[134,182,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(186,negated_conjecture,
( visFreeVar(esk1_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[183,135,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(187,negated_conjecture,
visFreeVar(esk1_0,vabs(esk4_0,esk5_0,veabs)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[186,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(188,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[187,136,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(189,negated_conjecture,
$false,
188,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COM125+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.22 % Computer : n021.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.22 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.22 % DateTime : Fri Mar 25 11:42:29 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.29 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.29 --creating new selector for [COM001+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.36 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpogKXte/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.36 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpogKXte/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.36 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.36 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.36 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.36 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.36 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.36 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------