TSTP Solution File: COM023+4 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COM023+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.02s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COM023+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 19:30:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.91/3.08 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 2.91/3.08 The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 2.91/3.08 Thu Jun 16 19:30:07 2022
% 2.91/3.08 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27023.
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.91/3.08 set(auto).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 2.91/3.08 clear(print_given).
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 formula_list(usable).
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 2.91/3.08 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 2.91/3.08 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.91/3.08 clauses in usable.
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.91/3.08 dependent: set(factor).
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 ------------> process usable:
% 2.91/3.08 810 back subsumes 680.
% 2.91/3.08 813 back subsumes 683.
% 2.91/3.08 816 back subsumes 686.
% 2.91/3.08 819 back subsumes 689.
% 2.91/3.08 822 back subsumes 692.
% 2.91/3.08 825 back subsumes 695.
% 2.91/3.08 828 back subsumes 698.
% 2.91/3.08 831 back subsumes 701.
% 2.91/3.08 834 back subsumes 704.
% 2.91/3.08 837 back subsumes 707.
% 2.91/3.08 840 back subsumes 710.
% 2.91/3.08 920 back subsumes 887.
% 2.91/3.08 923 back subsumes 890.
% 2.91/3.08 926 back subsumes 893.
% 2.91/3.08 929 back subsumes 896.
% 2.91/3.08 932 back subsumes 899.
% 2.91/3.08 935 back subsumes 902.
% 2.91/3.08 938 back subsumes 905.
% 2.91/3.08 941 back subsumes 908.
% 2.91/3.08 944 back subsumes 911.
% 2.91/3.08 947 back subsumes 914.
% 2.91/3.08 950 back subsumes 917.
% 2.91/3.08 1114 back subsumes 995.
% 2.91/3.08 1117 back subsumes 998.
% 2.91/3.08 1120 back subsumes 1001.
% 2.91/3.08 1123 back subsumes 1004.
% 2.91/3.08 1126 back subsumes 1007.
% 2.91/3.08 1129 back subsumes 1010.
% 2.91/3.08 1132 back subsumes 1013.
% 2.91/3.08 1135 back subsumes 1016.
% 2.91/3.08 1138 back subsumes 1019.
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 ------------> process sos:
% 2.91/3.08 Following clause subsumed by 1404 during input processing: 0 [copy,1404,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 2.91/3.08 1404 back subsumes 569.
% 2.91/3.08
% 2.91/3.08 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.15/3.34 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.15/3.34 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.15/3.34 number of clauses in intial UL: 1147
% 3.15/3.34 number of clauses initially in problem: 1164
% 3.15/3.34 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 3.15/3.34 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 3.15/3.34 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.15/3.34 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 3.15/3.34 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.15/3.34 distinct function count: 19
% 3.15/3.34 distinct constant count: 6
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.15/3.34
% 3.15/3.34 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------