TSTP Solution File: COM020+4 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COM020+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.05s 300.25s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : COM020+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 17:04:11 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.21/3.42 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 3.21/3.42 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 3.21/3.42 Thu Jun 16 17:04:11 2022
% 3.21/3.42 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10505.
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 3.21/3.42 set(auto).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(auto1).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(process_input).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 3.21/3.42 clear(print_given).
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 formula_list(usable).
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 3.21/3.42 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 3.21/3.42 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 3.21/3.42 clauses in usable.
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(para_from).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(para_into).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 3.21/3.42 dependent: set(factor).
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 ------------> process usable:
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)|xb!=A| -aReductOfIn0(A,xd,xR).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)|xb!=A| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xd,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xb,xR)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xd,xR).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xb,xR)| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xd,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xb,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xd,xR).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xb,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A)| -aElement0(C)| -aReductOfIn0(C,xd,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(C,xR,A).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,A)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xd,xR).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,A)| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xd,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,A)| -aReductOfIn0(A,xd,xR).
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 537 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aElement0(A)| -sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,A)| -aElement0(B)| -aReductOfIn0(B,xd,xR)| -sdtmndtplgtdt0(B,xR,A).
% 3.21/3.42 800 back subsumes 670.
% 3.21/3.42 803 back subsumes 673.
% 3.21/3.42 806 back subsumes 676.
% 3.21/3.42 809 back subsumes 679.
% 3.21/3.42 812 back subsumes 682.
% 3.21/3.42 815 back subsumes 685.
% 3.21/3.42 818 back subsumes 688.
% 3.21/3.42 821 back subsumes 691.
% 3.21/3.42 824 back subsumes 694.
% 3.21/3.42 827 back subsumes 697.
% 3.21/3.42 830 back subsumes 700.
% 3.21/3.42 910 back subsumes 877.
% 3.21/3.42 913 back subsumes 880.
% 3.21/3.42 916 back subsumes 883.
% 3.21/3.42 919 back subsumes 886.
% 3.21/3.42 922 back subsumes 889.
% 3.21/3.42 925 back subsumes 892.
% 3.21/3.42 928 back subsumes 895.
% 3.21/3.42 931 back subsumes 898.
% 3.21/3.42 934 back subsumes 901.
% 3.21/3.42 937 back subsumes 904.
% 3.21/3.42 940 back subsumes 907.
% 3.21/3.42 1104 back subsumes 985.
% 3.21/3.42 1107 back subsumes 988.
% 3.21/3.42 1110 back subsumes 991.
% 3.21/3.42 1113 back subsumes 994.
% 3.21/3.42 1116 back subsumes 997.
% 3.21/3.42 1119 back subsumes 1000.
% 3.21/3.42 1122 back subsumes 1003.
% 3.21/3.42 1125 back subsumes 1006.
% 3.21/3.42 1128 back subsumes 1009.
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 ------------> process sos:
% 3.21/3.42 Following clause subsumed by 1431 during input processing: 0 [copy,1431,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 3.21/3.42 1431 back subsumes 559.
% 3.21/3.42
% 3.21/3.42 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.34/3.54 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.34/3.54 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.34/3.54 number of clauses in intial UL: 1136
% 3.34/3.54 number of clauses initially in problem: 1183
% 3.34/3.54 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 3.34/3.54 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 3.34/3.54 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.34/3.54 absolute distinct symbol count: 45
% 3.34/3.54 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.34/3.54 distinct function count: 19
% 3.34/3.54 distinct constant count: 15
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.34/3.54
% 3.34/3.54 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.05/300.25 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------