TSTP Solution File: COM018+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : COM018+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:22:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 1 sgn; 5 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] : aNormalFormOfIn0(X1,xw,xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p',m__) ).
fof(mTermNF,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( aRewritingSystem0(X1)
& isTerminating0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( aElement0(X2)
=> ? [X3] : aNormalFormOfIn0(X3,X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p',mTermNF) ).
fof(m__656_01,hypothesis,
( isLocallyConfluent0(xR)
& isTerminating0(xR) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p',m__656_01) ).
fof(m__656,hypothesis,
aRewritingSystem0(xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p',m__656) ).
fof(m__799,hypothesis,
( aElement0(xw)
& sdtmndtasgtdt0(xu,xR,xw)
& sdtmndtasgtdt0(xv,xR,xw) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p',m__799) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] : aNormalFormOfIn0(X1,xw,xR),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X10] : ~ aNormalFormOfIn0(X10,xw,xR),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X20,X21] :
( ~ aRewritingSystem0(X20)
| ~ isTerminating0(X20)
| ~ aElement0(X21)
| aNormalFormOfIn0(esk4_2(X20,X21),X21,X20) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mTermNF])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ aNormalFormOfIn0(X1,xw,xR),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( aNormalFormOfIn0(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2,X1)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(X1)
| ~ isTerminating0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
isTerminating0(xR),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__656_01]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
aRewritingSystem0(xR),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__656]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
aElement0(xw),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__799]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : COM018+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:01:13 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BGiDm7KgJd/E---3.1_26625.p
% 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 26703 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 26706 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses : 55
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 0.18/0.48 # Processed clauses : 88
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 88
% 0.18/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Generated clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.18/0.48 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.18/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 23
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.18/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 101
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 51
% 0.18/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 301
% 0.18/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.18/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3950
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1880 pages
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.18/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------