TSTP Solution File: COM017+4 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COM017+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.26s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COM017+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:59:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.09/3.30 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 3.09/3.30 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 3.09/3.30 Thu Jun 16 18:59:52 2022
% 3.09/3.30 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24838.
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 3.09/3.30 set(auto).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(auto1).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(process_input).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 3.09/3.30 clear(print_given).
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 formula_list(usable).
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 3.09/3.30 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 3.09/3.30 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 3.09/3.30 clauses in usable.
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(para_from).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(para_into).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 3.09/3.30 dependent: set(factor).
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 ------------> process usable:
% 3.09/3.30 809 back subsumes 679.
% 3.09/3.30 812 back subsumes 682.
% 3.09/3.30 815 back subsumes 685.
% 3.09/3.30 818 back subsumes 688.
% 3.09/3.30 821 back subsumes 691.
% 3.09/3.30 824 back subsumes 694.
% 3.09/3.30 827 back subsumes 697.
% 3.09/3.30 830 back subsumes 700.
% 3.09/3.30 833 back subsumes 703.
% 3.09/3.30 836 back subsumes 706.
% 3.09/3.30 839 back subsumes 709.
% 3.09/3.30 919 back subsumes 886.
% 3.09/3.30 922 back subsumes 889.
% 3.09/3.30 925 back subsumes 892.
% 3.09/3.30 928 back subsumes 895.
% 3.09/3.30 931 back subsumes 898.
% 3.09/3.30 934 back subsumes 901.
% 3.09/3.30 937 back subsumes 904.
% 3.09/3.30 940 back subsumes 907.
% 3.09/3.30 943 back subsumes 910.
% 3.09/3.30 946 back subsumes 913.
% 3.09/3.30 949 back subsumes 916.
% 3.09/3.30 1113 back subsumes 994.
% 3.09/3.30 1116 back subsumes 997.
% 3.09/3.30 1119 back subsumes 1000.
% 3.09/3.30 1122 back subsumes 1003.
% 3.09/3.30 1125 back subsumes 1006.
% 3.09/3.30 1128 back subsumes 1009.
% 3.09/3.30 1131 back subsumes 1012.
% 3.09/3.30 1134 back subsumes 1015.
% 3.09/3.30 1137 back subsumes 1018.
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 ------------> process sos:
% 3.09/3.30 Following clause subsumed by 1415 during input processing: 0 [copy,1415,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 3.09/3.30 1415 back subsumes 568.
% 3.09/3.30
% 3.09/3.30 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.20/3.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.20/3.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.20/3.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 1146
% 3.20/3.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 1175
% 3.20/3.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 3.20/3.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 3.20/3.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.20/3.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 3.20/3.40 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.20/3.40 distinct function count: 19
% 3.20/3.40 distinct constant count: 10
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.20/3.40
% 3.20/3.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.26 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------