TSTP Solution File: COM017+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : COM017+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:06:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.54s 2.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   0 equ;  49 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_361,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xu,xR,X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xv,xR,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_361) ).

cnf(i_0_50,hypothesis,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,esk14_3(X2,X3,X1))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X2,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,X2,xR) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_353,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xu),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_353) ).

cnf(i_0_55,hypothesis,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,esk14_3(X2,X1,X3))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X2,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,X2,xR) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_360,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xv),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_360) ).

cnf(i_0_60,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X1,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X2,X1,xR) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_352,hypothesis,
    aReductOfIn0(xu,xa,xR),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_352) ).

cnf(i_0_359,hypothesis,
    aReductOfIn0(xv,xa,xR),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_359) ).

cnf(i_0_63,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bn4oywpr/lgb.p',i_0_63) ).

cnf(c_0_371,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xu,xR,X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xv,xR,X1) ),
    i_0_361 ).

cnf(c_0_372,hypothesis,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,esk14_3(X2,X3,X1))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X2,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,X2,xR) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_373,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xu),
    i_0_353 ).

cnf(c_0_374,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aReductOfIn0(xu,X1,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X2,X1,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(esk14_3(X1,X2,xu))
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xv,xR,esk14_3(X1,X2,xu)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_371,c_0_372]),c_0_373])]) ).

cnf(c_0_375,hypothesis,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,esk14_3(X2,X1,X3))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X2,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,X2,xR) ),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_376,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xv),
    i_0_360 ).

cnf(c_0_377,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aReductOfIn0(xu,X1,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(xv,X1,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(esk14_3(X1,xv,xu))
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_374,c_0_375]),c_0_376]),c_0_373])]) ).

cnf(c_0_378,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X3,X1,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(X2,X1,xR) ),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_379,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aReductOfIn0(xu,X1,xR)
    | ~ aReductOfIn0(xv,X1,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_377,c_0_378]),c_0_373]),c_0_376])]) ).

cnf(c_0_380,hypothesis,
    aReductOfIn0(xu,xa,xR),
    i_0_352 ).

cnf(c_0_381,hypothesis,
    aReductOfIn0(xv,xa,xR),
    i_0_359 ).

cnf(c_0_382,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xa),
    i_0_63 ).

cnf(c_0_383,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_379,c_0_380]),c_0_381]),c_0_382])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COM017+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:59:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.54/2.40  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.54/2.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.54/2.40  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.54/2.40  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 8.54/2.40  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.54/2.40  #
% 8.54/2.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 8.54/2.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.54/2.40  
% 8.54/2.40  # Proof found!
% 8.54/2.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.54/2.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.54/2.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.54/2.40  
% 8.54/2.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.54/2.40  # User time                : 0.063 s
% 8.54/2.40  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 8.54/2.40  # Total time               : 0.072 s
% 8.54/2.40  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.54/2.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------