TSTP Solution File: COM016+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : COM016+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:06:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.37s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 8 unt; 6 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 2 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_351,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != xb
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,xa,xR) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_351) ).
cnf(i_0_62,hypothesis,
aElement0(xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_62) ).
cnf(i_0_345,hypothesis,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| aReductOfIn0(esk20_0,xa,xR) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_345) ).
cnf(i_0_346,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk20_0)
| aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_346) ).
cnf(i_0_344,hypothesis,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk20_0,xR,xb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_344) ).
cnf(i_0_348,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,xa,xR)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_p8ws1rf/lgb.p',i_0_348) ).
cnf(c_0_358,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != xb
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,xa,xR) ),
i_0_351 ).
cnf(c_0_359,hypothesis,
aElement0(xb),
i_0_62 ).
cnf(c_0_360,hypothesis,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| aReductOfIn0(esk20_0,xa,xR) ),
i_0_345 ).
cnf(c_0_361,negated_conjecture,
~ aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_358]),c_0_359])]) ).
cnf(c_0_362,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk20_0)
| aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR) ),
i_0_346 ).
cnf(c_0_363,hypothesis,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk20_0,xR,xb) ),
i_0_344 ).
cnf(c_0_364,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,xa,xR)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xb) ),
i_0_348 ).
cnf(c_0_365,hypothesis,
aReductOfIn0(esk20_0,xa,xR),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_360,c_0_361]) ).
cnf(c_0_366,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk20_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_362,c_0_361]) ).
cnf(c_0_367,hypothesis,
sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk20_0,xR,xb),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_363,c_0_361]) ).
cnf(c_0_368,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk20_0,xR,xb),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_364,c_0_365]),c_0_366])]) ).
cnf(c_0_369,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_367,c_0_368]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : COM016+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 17:28:17 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.37/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.37/2.28 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.37/2.28 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.37/2.28 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 7.37/2.28 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 7.37/2.28 #
% 7.37/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 7.37/2.28 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.37/2.28
% 7.37/2.28 # Proof found!
% 7.37/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.37/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.37/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.37/2.28
% 7.37/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.37/2.28 # User time : 0.020 s
% 7.37/2.28 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.37/2.28 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 7.37/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.37/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------